Teams

Matchpoint Tri

2026 Tri-Level Women · 4.5,4.0,3.5

6 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SOUTHERN REGION

View scouting list →
Schedule14 played
2026-04-12vs Taconic Tri BreakersWon 10
W#1 DoublesDeirdre Gaspari / Kristi Greco vs Lindsay Pell / Phyllis WAN-HUEN6-3, 7-6
2026-04-12vs Break Point TennisWon 10
W#1 DoublesVictoria Madonna / Pearllan Mary Cipriano vs Ellen Robertson / Shikha Raturi6-1, 6-4
L#1 DoublesElizabeth McCollum / Hairong Xing vs Barbara Moran / Jennifer Ward0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesShellie Malachi / Stephanie Shum vs Gina Imperiale / Susan Cooper1-6, 0-6
2026-03-29vs Break Point TennisLost 01
L#1 DoublesLaureen Cantwell / Gillian Cobb vs Brandi Falcone / Ellen Robertson4-6, 6-7
2026-03-29vs Sportsplex TouchLost 01
L#2 DoublesTiffany Christopher / Shellie Malachi vs Tracy Andrews / Irina Constantine3-6, 7-5, 0-1
2026-03-22vs Taconic-McLeod/JarvisWon 10
W#1 DoublesCarolyn Pinheiro / Kristi Greco vs Jennifer Corrado / Danielle Franzella7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2026-03-22vs Southern: WTLOVLost 01
L#2 DoublesAnn Byrne / Shellie Malachi vs Bianca Verrilli / Cassidy Nasello2-6, 4-6
2026-03-15vs Break Point TennisWon 10
W#2 DoublesShellie Malachi / Tiffany Christopher vs Andrea Piehler / Haley Springston6-0, 6-1
2026-03-08vs PTC Slice GirlsWon 10
W#1 DoublesDeirdre Gaspari / Kristi Greco vs Laureen Cantwell / Corinna Kazolias-Gregory7-6, 7-6
L#1 DoublesMelissa Bamford / Victoria Madonna vs Mary Berezowsky / Lucy Burnes4-6, 4-6
2026-03-01vs Southern: WTLOVWon 10
W#1 DoublesKristi Greco / Deirdre Gaspari vs Susie Choi / Kelly Ryan7-5, 6-4
2026-03-01vs Solo Women's 4.0 TrilevelSplit 11
W#1 DoublesGillian Cobb / Laureen Cantwell vs Valerie Gropper / Karen Rossi6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesTiffany Christopher / Shellie Malachi vs Kari Rieser / Penelope Donhauser4-6, 2-6
2026-02-01vs Taconic-McLeod/JarvisLost 01
L#1 DoublesGillian Cobb / Laureen Cantwell vs Roge Nesbitt / Carlisle Stockton5-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesShellie Malachi / Tiffany Christopher vs Gina Imperiale / Lisa Olney4-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5,4.0,3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.65 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.12
Gabriela Medina
published 4.5
3.76
Kristi Greco
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.75
Victoria Madonna
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.62
Gillian Cobb
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.49
Elizabeth McCollum
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.18
Shellie Malachi
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Gabriela Medina
54W–38L career · no lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
4.12
Kristi Greco
44W–52L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%94%3%
3.76
4
Victoria Madonna
240W–163L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Gillian Cobb
126W–113L career · 3 lines in 2026
18%82%<1%
3.62
3.5
Elizabeth McCollum
50W–34L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%52%48%
3.49
Shellie Malachi
23W–10L career · 6 lines in 2026
8%91%1%
3.18

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.