Teams

Wilson, OCC, 4.0 18

2023 LAF Adult 18 & Over - Women Night · 4.0 LAF (18&O) Women Night

15 players · average NTRP 3.83 / LOUISIANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-05-11vs LeMaire, BroussardWon 10
W#2 DoublesTammi Robicheaux / Angela Robichaux vs Vicki Tate / Brandy Musemeche6-1, 6-4
2023-04-26vs DePriest, Red’s, LAF Night 18&OWon 10
W#2 SinglesAngela Robichaux vs Tamara Rahim6-3, 6-4
2023-03-15vs LeMaire, BroussardLost 01
L#2 DoublesNichole Forstall / Angela Robichaux vs Carmela Mathews / Madeleine Burch2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-03-05vs DePriest, Red’s, LAF Night 18&OLost 01
L#2 SinglesAngela Robichaux vs Tamara Rahim4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 LAF (18&O) Women Night have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.63 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Eileen Fruge
published
3.79
Donna Briley
published
3.78
Alaina Wilson
published 4
3.68
Nicole Bergeron
published
3.66
Morgan Louviere
published
3.65
Beth Comeaux
published 4
3.62
Tonya Anderson
published
3.58
Tammi Robicheaux
published
3.56
Jennifer Schwing
published
3.56
Janice Searle
published
3.51
Laura Wiggins
published
3.34
Nichole Forstall
published
Angela Robichaux
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published 3.5
Jenni Cooper
published
Jennifer Marine
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Beth Comeaux + Laura Wiggins213 matchesnot enough data
Tammi Robicheaux + Tonya Anderson033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Eileen Fruge
16W–9L career · no lines in 2023
1%88%11%
3.83
Donna Briley
9W–14L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.79
4
Alaina Wilson
7W–9L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.78
Nicole Bergeron
23W–18L career · no lines in 2023
9%89%1%
3.68
Morgan Louviere
6W–15L career · no lines in 2023
13%86%1%
3.66
4
Beth Comeaux
7W–5L career · no lines in 2023
13%86%1%
3.65
Tonya Anderson
22W–19L career · no lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
3.62
Tammi Robicheaux
8W–16L career · no lines in 2023
29%71%<1%
3.58
Jennifer Schwing
9W–9L career · no lines in 2023
33%67%<1%
3.56
Janice Searle
15W–19L career · no lines in 2023
34%66%<1%
3.56
Laura Wiggins
8W–9L career · no lines in 2023
48%52%<1%
3.51
Nichole Forstall
29W–32L career · no lines in 2023
1%87%13%
3.34
3.5
Angela Robichaux
67W–92L career · 10 lines in 2023
not enough data
Jenni Cooper
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Jennifer Marine
3W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.