Teams

Brookhaven/Frenkel-Smercina W3.5F

2026 DALLAS TENNIS N · A 18 & Over ADULT Fall W. Friday

20 players · average NTRP 3.40 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-10-24vs Greenhill/Lipshy-Oujedzsky W3.5FLost 02
L#1 DoublesAshley Russell / Asheley Wagnon vs Julie Sayah / Mary Ann Walters2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJohanna Anderson / Meridith Hayes vs Kelly Oujezdsky / Brenda Reynolds2-6, 1-6
2025-10-10vs Lakewood/Cook W3.5FLost 01
L#1 DoublesNorma Anderson / Ashley Russell vs Elizabeth Cholerton / Heather Murphy2-6, 4-6
2025-09-26vs DCC/Slaven W3.5FWon 20
W#1 DoublesJohanna Anderson / Marylene Leogier vs Daley Bennett / Jessica Slaven5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJena Anderson / Meridith Hayes vs Destin Shore / Jennifer Carlson4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-09-12vs High Point/Tucker-Wise W3.5FSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJohanna Anderson / Marylene Leogier vs Deganit Gal / Tricia Ehrisman2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesAshley Russell / Heather Smercina vs Shari Nederhoff / Chelsea Northam6-4, 2-0
2025-09-05Lost 12
L#1 DoublesJohanna Anderson / Marylene Leogier vs Dao Kelly / Stephanie Smith2-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesJena Anderson / London Henderson vs Mindy Lucas / Elaine Kelley6-3, 7-5
L#3 DoublesSonali Agrawal / Jana Milstein vs Amy Clark / Linda Trahan6-7, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for A 18 & Over ADULT Fall W. Friday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.54
London Henderson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.41
Sonali Agrawal
usually #1 Singles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
3.35
Amy Loehr
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.30
Marci Frenkel
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.28
Marylene Leogier
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.26
Jena Anderson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.25
Morgan Gulbas
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.25
Jordan McMakin
published
3.22
Amy McKinley
published 3.5
3.16
Ashley Russell
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.16
Ann Marie Bishop
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.02
Meridith Hayes
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.00
Heather Smercina
usually #3 Doubles 58%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
2.87
Jana Milstein
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.85
Jessica Kirwan
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.76
Asheley Wagnon
usually #3 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 3
2.74
Dionne Flynn
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Johanna Anderson
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Leslie Atkins
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Norma Anderson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marci Frenkel + Morgan Gulbas4256% games+9.8% vs expected
Jessica Kirwan + Dionne Flynn4844% games+3.5% vs expected
Jessica Kirwan + Heather Smercina3253% gamesnot enough data
Marylene Leogier + Jordan McMakin224 matchesnot enough data
Ann Marie Bishop + Morgan Gulbas314 matchesnot enough data
Dionne Flynn + Heather Smercina134 matchesnot enough data
London Henderson + Jena Anderson303 matchesnot enough data
Marylene Leogier + Johanna Anderson123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

London Henderson
3W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%40%60%
3.54
Sonali Agrawal
15W–12L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
3.41
3.5
Amy Loehr
3W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
1%84%15%
3.35
Marci Frenkel
13W–6L career · 5 lines in 2026
2%91%8%
3.30
Marylene Leogier
6W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.28
Jena Anderson
6W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.26
Morgan Gulbas
11W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
3.25
Jordan McMakin
4W–5L career · no lines in 2026
4%93%3%
3.25
3.5
Amy McKinley
8W–13L career · no lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Ashley Russell
2W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
12%87%1%
3.16
3.5
Ann Marie Bishop
6W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
13%86%1%
3.16
Meridith Hayes
3W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
46%54%<1%
3.02
Heather Smercina
22W–29L career · 12 lines in 2026
<1%51%49%
3.00
Jana Milstein
3W–10L career · 1 line in 2026
82%18%<1%
2.87
Jessica Kirwan
11W–18L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%85%14%
2.85
3
Asheley Wagnon
7W–10L career · 8 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
2.76
Dionne Flynn
8W–24L career · 5 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
2.74
Johanna Anderson
5W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Leslie Atkins
8W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Norma Anderson
11W–13L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.