Teams

FK - Hatfield

2022 Marion Adult 55 & Over · 8.0 Adult Women 55 & Over

12 players · average NTRP 3.75 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-03-19vs Marion - FK/CentonzeWon 10
W#1 DoublesYvonne Schappell / Pamela Plumlee vs Elaine Parker / Eileen Lombardo6-3, 6-7, 1-0
2022-02-26vs Villages - EngSplit 11
W#1 DoublesPamela Plumlee / Yvonne Schappell vs Judy Hoops / Jennifer Blanzy6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesPatti Hischmann / Nancy Little vs Linda Jarres / Jill Kimball2-6, 6-7
2022-02-19vs SKY - PayneWon 10
W#2 DoublesYvonne Schappell / Patti Hischmann vs Linda Lademann / Laura Flanagan6-2, 6-3
2022-02-12vs Marion - FK/CentonzeLost 02
L#1 DoublesYvonne Schappell / Erica Migliorati vs Beth Riendeau / Amy Graham4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesPatti Hischmann / Linda Jones vs Elaine Parker / Eileen Lombardo4-6, 5-7
2022-01-22Won 10
W#2 DoublesPatti Hischmann / Maricel Keiter vs Barbara Slavin / Debbie Bohl6-7, 7-5, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Adult Women 55 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.36 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
Yvonne Schappell
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
Erica Migliorati
published 4
3.71
Linda Jones
published
3.19
3.15
Kathy Hatfield
published
3.14
Donna Jarvis
published 3.5
3.05
Maricel Keiter
published
Marcia Plante
published
Nancy Little
published
Pamela Plumlee
published
Patti Hischmann
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Tamara Gorski
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kathy Hatfield + Deborah Borge-Shaffer303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Yvonne Schappell
131W–57L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%73%27%
3.92
4
Erica Migliorati
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Linda Jones
24W–14L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.71
3.5
Deborah Borge-Shaffer
5W–4L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.19
Kathy Hatfield
60W–73L career · no lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
3.15
3.5
Donna Jarvis
2W–4L career · no lines in 2022
13%86%<1%
3.14
Maricel Keiter
5W–10L career · no lines in 2022
34%66%<1%
3.05
Marcia Plante
2W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Nancy Little
2W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Pamela Plumlee
4W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Patti Hischmann
23W–30L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Tamara Gorski
9W–8L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.