Teams

RVR RED

2024 CTA TWILIGHT - MOUNTAINS · WOMEN 3.0 - TWILIGHT - MOUNTAINS

8 players · average NTRP 3.38 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-09-25vs HCC REDWon 10
W#2 DoublesCarla Ostberg / Zoe Herreid vs Susan Chipman / Jamie Pitt Miller6-0, 6-4
2024-09-18vs RVR ORANGEWon 20
W#1 DoublesKatie Karow / Zoe Herreid vs Carrie Kellman / Morgan Warth6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesCarla Ostberg vs Alicia Miller6-3, 6-3
2024-09-11vs GSCC BLUEWon 20
W#1 DoublesZoe Herreid / Audrey Imhoff vs Carolyn Strautman / Heather Knott6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesCarla Ostberg / Michelle Bevington vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-09-04vs CROWN REDWon 10
W#1 DoublesZoe Herreid / Carla Ostberg vs Amy Daniel / Kara Lizotte6-2, 6-2
2024-08-28vs BASALT PURPLELost 01
L#1 DoublesCarla Ostberg / Michelle Bevington vs Lauren Raymond / Christina Schluter2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2024-08-24vs SMGLR REDWon 20
W#1 DoublesZoe Herreid / Michelle Bevington vs Betsy Black / Gwen Cohen6-1, 6-3
W#1 SinglesCarla Ostberg vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-08-14vs GSCC PURPLEWon 20
W#1 DoublesZoe Herreid / Katie Bailey vs Emelie Piper / Kate Leibinger6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMichelle Bevington / Carla Ostberg vs Melody Morris / Julie Hartman6-0, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - TWILIGHT - MOUNTAINS have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.49
Katie Bailey
published
3.46
Carla Ostberg
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Singles 29% · published 3.5
3.29
Zoe Herreid
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.24
Katie Karow
published
3.16
Audrey Imhoff
published 3.5
3.14
Yoko Smith Rhodes
published
3.08
Michelle Bevington
published
2.92
Anne Goldberg
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Audrey Imhoff + Carla Ostberg6260% games+10.7% vs expected
Carla Ostberg + Zoe Herreid21268% games+10.5% vs expected
Audrey Imhoff + Michelle Bevington404 matchesnot enough data
Audrey Imhoff + Katie Bailey404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Katie Bailey
18W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%52%48%
3.49
3.5
Carla Ostberg
83W–32L career · 7 lines in 2024
<1%60%40%
3.46
3.5
Zoe Herreid
45W–18L career · type A · 6 lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.29
Katie Karow
9W–9L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%3%
3.24
3.5
Audrey Imhoff
19W–7L career · no lines in 2024
12%87%1%
3.16
Yoko Smith Rhodes
21W–12L career · no lines in 2024
16%84%1%
3.14
Michelle Bevington
17W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%29%71%
3.08
3
Anne Goldberg
21W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%72%28%
2.92

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.