Teams

SD 3.5 CTC/ Cays (2:3)/ Schmied

2023 Adult 18 & Over Spring - SD · SD - Women - 3.5

9 players · average NTRP 3.38 / SAN DIEGO

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-06-06vs SD 3.5 Peninsula TC (3:2)/ GamaraLost 01
L#1 DoublesLeslie Vineyard / Susan Dussault vs Birte Lightner / Nadine Utz1-6, 1-6
2023-05-30vs SD 3.5 Mtn View (3:2)/ PadillaWon 20
W#1 DoublesMaria Simon / Leslie Vineyard vs Patricia Enriquez / Tenley Gritts6-4, 7-6
W#2 DoublesChristy Ward / Caroline Mickel vs Sylvia Devoe / Frances Simpson Lang6-2, 1-6, 1-0
2023-05-23vs SD 3.5 Peninsula TC (3:2)/ TrentWon 10
W#3 DoublesCaroline Mickel / Susan Dussault vs Lisa Serrano / Cherie Hibbs3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2023-05-02vs SD 3.5 SDTRC (2:3)/ MonzonWon 10
W#3 DoublesChristy Ward / Caroline Mickel vs Heather Ravenscroft / Kristan Hanson6-0, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesChristy Ward / Caroline Mickel vs Ciara Levine / Christiana Thieler6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesJoan Fahrenthold / Leslie Vineyard vs Betsy Witt / Kelly Thomas3-6, 2-6
2023-04-18vs SD 3.5 Mtn View (3:2)/ MorganWon 10
W#3 DoublesCaroline Mickel / Christy Ward vs Michele Kelley / Hikari Blancarte6-1, 6-2
2023-04-11vs SD LLW 3.5 Coronado TC/ NicholsLost 02
L#1 DoublesCaroline Mickel / Heather Grimes vs Hayley Connors / Katerina Hart3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJoan Fahrenthold / Leslie Vineyard vs Megan West / Jessica Cunningham1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SD - Women - 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.04 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.42
Ana Paula Gonzalez
published 3.5
3.33
Caroline Mickel
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.25
Margaret Holland
published
3.21
Meagan McKissick
published
3.15
Erin Enrico
published 3.5
2.90
Susan Dussault
published
2.87
Leslie Vineyard
usually #1 Doubles 70%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.75
Veronica Marti
published
2.47
Lucinda Swain
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ana Paula Gonzalez + Susan Dussault123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Ana Paula Gonzalez
9W–15L career · no lines in 2023
<1%73%27%
3.42
3.5
Caroline Mickel
65W–61L career · 10 lines in 2023
1%90%9%
3.33
Margaret Holland
15W–13L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%3%
3.25
Meagan McKissick
7W–3L career · no lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Erin Enrico
3W–7L career · no lines in 2023
12%88%<1%
3.15
Susan Dussault
10W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%77%23%
2.90
3
Leslie Vineyard
30W–51L career · 10 lines in 2023
<1%85%15%
2.87
Veronica Marti
3W–4L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%3%
2.75
Lucinda Swain
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
60%40%<1%
2.47

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.