Teams

TIA White Plains 3.5 Red

2026 18&Over Women Day Winter · 3.5 Day

17 players · average NTRP 3.36 / SOUTHERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-03-11vs Armonk Tennis Club: Ace Ace BabyWon 21
W#1 DoublesRanda Sauerborn / Stephanie Kirwan vs Beth Grotta / Nadia Weiss6-0, 6-3
L#2 DoublesAnna Schuler / Catherine Chatham vs Dina Weinstein / Sophia Kim3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesYael Wepman / Claudia Zumbro vs Shari Matusow / Lauren Anchin5-7, 6-4
2026-03-03vs Armonk Tennis Club Smart AcesSplit 11
L#1 DoublesRanda Sauerborn / Anna Schuler vs Cathy Hammes / Zoe Robertson2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesYumiko Tanaka / Allison Prigozen vs Addie Havemeyer / Karen Jung6-1, 6-2
W#1 DoublesYumiko Tanaka / Helene Ginsburg vs Jennifer Sheehy / Liz SusmanKarp6-7, 5-4
W#2 DoublesCatherine Chatham / Stephanie Kirwan vs Danielle Powers / Cindy Greenstein6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSandra Brudnick / Dana Hirsch vs Svetlana Rud / Joan Behren6-2, 6-2
2026-02-03vs Club Fit Briarcliff: FirecrackersLost 12
L#1 DoublesAnna Schuler / Randa Sauerborn vs Kate Pershing / Susan Flanagan6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesYumiko Tanaka / Dana Hirsch vs Catherine Hammond / Chloe O'Brien6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSandra Brudnick / Catherine Chatham vs Toby Amidor / Joanna Segal3-6, 6-7
2026-01-28vs WTC: The Hot ShotsLost 12
L#1 DoublesAnna Schuler / Randa Sauerborn vs Stephanie Teitelbaum / Ashley Smith2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesYumiko Tanaka / Helene Ginsburg vs Sophie Sandford / Jennifer Helgesen1-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesAllison Prigozen / Dana Hirsch vs Nicole Warren / Alison Levy7-6, 4-3
2026-01-20vs WTC: FUNdamentalistsWon 21
W#1 DoublesHelene Ginsburg / Yumiko Tanaka vs Donna Eldredge / Annie Itkin6-0, 6-3
L#2 DoublesIrene Briganti / Allison Prigozen vs Katie Walbridge / Megan Kerr1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesCatherine Chatham / Stephanie Kirwan vs Yang Chen / Meredith Slater6-1, 6-3
2026-01-14vs Rye Racquette Club: RacquettesLost 12
L#1 DoublesAnna Schuler / Helene Ginsburg vs Elizabeth Toussi / Yuka Endo3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesDana Hirsch / Sandra Brudnick vs Rebecca Dickson / Deidre Kimble0-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesAllison Prigozen / Irene Briganti vs Lillian Schulz / Hayley Warshaw6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 DoublesRanda Sauerborn / Helene Ginsburg vs Michele Bond / Maggi Maksoud3-6, 0-2
L#2 DoublesKathleen Finlay / Anna Schuler vs Malka Shenker / Marla Heimowitz5-7, 2-6
W#3 DoublesYumiko Tanaka / Catherine Chatham vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.21 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.73
Lukas Michenka
published
3.47
Randa Sauerborn
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.35
Stephanie Kirwan
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.25
Allison Prigozen
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.21
Kathleen Finlay
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.19
Helene Ginsburg
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
3.17
Jenn Yee
published 3.5
3.16
Yumiko Tanaka
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.09
Anna Schuler
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.09
Dana Hirsch
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.03
Yael Wepman
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.02
Catherine Chatham
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.02
Jamie Camhi
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.97
Sandra Brudnick
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.96
Sukaina Klein
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.95
Claudia Zumbro
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.91
Irene Briganti
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Irene Briganti + Sukaina Klein7158% games+14.4% vs expected
Claudia Zumbro + Sukaina Klein19959% games+12.6% vs expected
Dana Hirsch + Sandra Brudnick411460% games+6.2% vs expected
Stephanie Kirwan + Kathleen Finlay9454% games+6.2% vs expected
Sandra Brudnick + Jamie Camhi5263% games+5.6% vs expected
Yumiko Tanaka + Helene Ginsburg4155% games+4.8% vs expected
Anna Schuler + Helene Ginsburg161152% games−1.5% vs expected
Anna Schuler + Yumiko Tanaka6649% games−2.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lukas Michenka
13W–13L career · no lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.73
Randa Sauerborn
79W–57L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%59%41%
3.47
Stephanie Kirwan
22W–23L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%86%14%
3.35
3.5
Allison Prigozen
37W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
3.25
Kathleen Finlay
36W–35L career · 1 line in 2026
7%91%2%
3.21
Helene Ginsburg
82W–74L career · 6 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.19
3.5
Jenn Yee
63W–42L career · no lines in 2026
12%88%1%
3.17
Yumiko Tanaka
102W–40L career · 6 lines in 2026
12%87%1%
3.16
3.5
Anna Schuler
187W–155L career · 6 lines in 2026
25%74%<1%
3.09
3.5
Dana Hirsch
52W–21L career · 4 lines in 2026
26%74%<1%
3.09
Yael Wepman
42W–29L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%42%58%
3.03
3.5
Catherine Chatham
137W–102L career · 4 lines in 2026
43%57%<1%
3.02
Jamie Camhi
41W–19L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%45%55%
3.02
Sandra Brudnick
50W–20L career · 3 lines in 2026
58%42%<1%
2.97
Sukaina Klein
40W–16L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%62%38%
2.96
3
Claudia Zumbro
51W–27L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%64%36%
2.95
3
Irene Briganti
73W–35L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%75%25%
2.91

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.