Teams

TCSP-Nevertheless...Ellison

2021 Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.27 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2020-10-17vs BC-Vintage-AndersonWon 21
W#1 DoublesWendy Ellison / Francisca Lehr vs Kim Smallwood / Tricie Hunter6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesRosemary Curran / Suanty Kaghan vs Carol Nissen / Lisa Gaan6-0, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKaji Dyson / Ann Bowden vs Indu Tursa / Sherilyn Anderson0-6, 1-6
2020-10-10vs BETC-HollarLost 12
L#1 DoublesFrancisca Lehr / Ann Bowden vs Sheri Borden / Christine Brakke1-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesRosemary Curran / Elizabeth Franklin vs Margaret Nomi / MARILYN PORTER0-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesWendy Ellison / Jaclyn Brandt vs Kay Almer / Cathy Hollar6-3, 6-4
2020-10-02vs CAC/SL-SabinLost 03
L#1 DoublesWendy Ellison / Cecilia Moens vs Dawn Sabin / Diane Murray1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJaclyn Brandt / Suanty Kaghan vs Anne Roth / Beverly Lueth0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesCarol Geballe / Kaji Dyson vs Karen Lang / Mee Lee0-6, 6-4, 0-1
2020-09-27vs CP-Team Kaboom-CzerwinskiLost 12
L#1 DoublesWendy Ellison / Cecilia Moens vs Leslie Bouton / Carla Stanford3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKaji Dyson / Ann Bowden vs Mary Czerwinski / Mistie Iseman1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesRosemary Curran / Suanty Kaghan vs Nancy Yen / Linda Greenlaw6-4, 6-0
2020-09-20vs HBSQ-ChoLost 03
L#1 DoublesFrancisca Lehr / Janine Silvernale vs Kathleen Hauer / Susan Thornberg1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesCecilia Moens / Wendy Ellison vs Colleen Tracy / Linda Fletcher3-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesElizabeth Franklin / Jaclyn Brandt vs Rebecca Ringer / Corliss Liekkio5-7, 3-6
2020-09-11vs Lower Woodland-HartWon 30
W#1 DoublesJanine Silvernale / Francisca Lehr vs Tracy Jolly / Amy Zimbelman4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesWendy Ellison / Cecilia Moens vs Marybeth Alwood / Sue Thompson7-6, 4-3
W#3 DoublesSusan Holt / Rosemary Curran vs Lois Mustonen / Judy Ozuna6-3, 6-4
2020-09-06vs RBW-Steager CoeLost 12
W#1 DoublesFrancisca Lehr / Cecilia Moens vs Lori Steager Coe / Natalie Delbrueck6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesRosemary Curran / Suanty Kaghan vs Terri Smith / Naoko Reynolds2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesKaji Dyson / Susan Holt vs Ellen Murphy / Cynthia Finan4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings14 teams · 7.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Lower Woodland-Team Thing-Stone802228149
2HBSQ-Vitcovich6215920189
3AYTC (OUTDOORS) Edwards 7.062141022212
4BETC-Hollar4312918179
5CP-Team Kaboom-Czerwinski43101126202
6BETC-Kamplaine44101428220
7EDG-The Fun Bus-Kainz 5544111330203
8BC-Vintage-Anderson3481331207
9BC-Seniorettes-Walker35111329236
10WSC-Sheldon-Smith35101432228
11TCSP-Nevertheless...Ellison2581328207
12RBW-Williams26111328191
13Lower Woodland-Hart0741736235
14CAC/SL-King0842042272

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.03 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.30
Janine Silvernale
published
Jaclyn Brandt
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.15
Cecilia Moens
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.13
Elizabeth Franklin
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.11
Francisca Lehr
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.05
Susan Holt
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.02
Rosemary Curran
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
3.00
Wendy Ellison
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.96
Suanty Kaghan
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
Carol Geballe
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
Kaji Dyson
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.58
Ann Bowden
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Wendy Ellison + Francisca Lehr2450% games+7.4% vs expected
Wendy Ellison + Kaji Dyson2449% games−0.6% vs expected
Kaji Dyson + Rosemary Curran71050% games−2.2% vs expected
Cecilia Moens + Wendy Ellison2445% games−4.0% vs expected
Wendy Ellison + Elizabeth Franklin123 matchesnot enough data
Susan Holt + Rosemary Curran303 matchesnot enough data
Suanty Kaghan + Rosemary Curran213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Janine Silvernale
46W–37L career · no lines in 2021
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Jaclyn Brandt
5W–10L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
3.5
Cecilia Moens
52W–75L career · 5 lines in 2021
12%88%<1%
3.15
3.5
Elizabeth Franklin
46W–35L career · 2 lines in 2021
17%83%<1%
3.13
3.5
Francisca Lehr
88W–100L career · 5 lines in 2021
21%79%<1%
3.11
3.5
Susan Holt
68W–40L career · type A · 4 lines in 2021
36%64%<1%
3.05
3
Rosemary Curran
51W–58L career · 5 lines in 2021
<1%44%56%
3.02
3.5
Wendy Ellison
61W–109L career · 6 lines in 2021
50%50%<1%
3.00
3
Suanty Kaghan
99W–82L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%62%38%
2.96
3
Carol Geballe
38W–54L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
3
Kaji Dyson
22W–52L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
3
Ann Bowden
66W–88L career · 9 lines in 2021
27%73%<1%
2.58

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.