Teams

Fried Legs

2024 65 & Over League · Women 8.0 - 65 & Over

12 players · average NTRP 3.60 / MONTANA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-08-04vs Scrambled LegsLost 02
L#1 DoublesSherry Varner / Margaret Moffatt vs Willa Craig / Elizabeth Brennan2-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesCheryl Scott / Ginger Blevins vs Colleen Green / Jean Clary0-6, 1-6
2024-08-01vs Scrambled LegsLost 12
L#1 DoublesAnn Chrisler / Karen Vinton vs Carol Shannon / Jan DeCosse4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesTami DeGrosky / Martha Yates vs Shelley Geiszler / Sarah Miller6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesCheryl Scott / Ginger Blevins vs Colleen Green / Jean Clary5-7, 2-6
2024-07-31vs Scrambled LegsLost 12
L#1 DoublesCheryl Scott / Ginger Blevins vs Colleen Green / Jean Clary4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKaren Vinton / Cyndy Desin vs Gatchina Hessler / Linda Stancil4-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesMartha Yates / Margaret Moffatt vs Shelley Geiszler / Sarah Miller6-7, 7-5, 1-0
2024-07-31vs Scrambled LegsLost 12
L#1 DoublesTami DeGrosky / Martha Yates vs Willa Craig / Elizabeth Brennan2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesNora Miller / Karen Vinton vs Carol Shannon / Jan DeCosse2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesShirley Hansen / Sharon Warren vs Gatchina Hessler / Linda Stancil2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-07-08vs Scrambled LegsWon 21
W#1 DoublesTami DeGrosky / Sherry Varner vs Willa Craig / Elizabeth Brennan1-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMartha Yates / Margaret Moffatt vs Shelley Geiszler / Sarah Miller6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesSharon Warren / Karen Vinton vs Gatchina Hessler / Linda Stancil4-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · Women 8.0 - 65 & Over
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Fried Legs1451023162

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.48
Margaret Moffatt
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.42
Tami DeGrosky
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.26
Cheryl Scott
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
Ann Chrisler
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.93
Cyndy Desin
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Ginger Blevins
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Karen Vinton
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
Martha Yates
published
Nora Miller
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Sharon Warren
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Sherry Varner
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Shirley Hansen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nora Miller + Cheryl Scott3447% gamesnot enough data
Karen Vinton + Shirley Hansen3249% gamesnot enough data
Ginger Blevins + Cheryl Scott0535% gamesnot enough data
Sharon Warren + Shirley Hansen224 matchesnot enough data
Ann Chrisler + Karen Vinton123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Margaret Moffatt
17W–33L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%55%45%
3.48
4
Tami DeGrosky
4W–9L career · 3 lines in 2024
71%29%<1%
3.42
3.5
Cheryl Scott
16W–29L career · 5 lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.26
3.5
Ann Chrisler
6W–9L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Cyndy Desin
59W–102L career · 3 lines in 2024
70%30%<1%
2.93
Ginger Blevins
0W–5L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Karen Vinton
11W–17L career · 7 lines in 2024
not enough data
Martha Yates
4W–6L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Nora Miller
8W–14L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Sharon Warren
3W–5L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Sherry Varner
80W–48L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Shirley Hansen
10W–4L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.