Teams

Greenhill/Thornton-Hark W3.5

2024 DALLAS TENNIS N · A 18 & Over ADULT Fall W. Friday

18 players · average NTRP 3.39 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for A 18 & Over ADULT Fall W. Friday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.61
Amanda Forrest
published 3.5
3.51
Stephanie Shah
published
3.30
Linda Potts
published
3.26
Wincy Tomecko
published
Diane Scovell
published 3.5
Jackie Fogle
published 3.5
3.24
Amy McKinley
published 3.5
3.20
Claudine Vazquez
published 3.5
3.20
Joy Sebold
published
3.16
Julie Bullard
published
3.10
Christine Marlowe
published 3.5
3.08
Erin Baldwin
published 3.5
2.80
Sandy Barrett Brown
published
2.79
Diane Mizerany
published 3
Betty Park
published 3
Juli Henley
published
Katherine Hawkins
published
Marianne Hark
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Erin Baldwin + Amanda Forrest7359% games+5.0% vs expected
Stephanie Shah + Joy Sebold6645% games−2.8% vs expected
Julie Bullard + Amanda Forrest6061% gamesnot enough data
Stephanie Shah + Amanda Forrest314 matchesnot enough data
Marianne Hark + Joy Sebold123 matchesnot enough data
Marianne Hark + Julie Bullard123 matchesnot enough data
Marianne Hark + Amanda Forrest303 matchesnot enough data
Joy Sebold + Amanda Forrest123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Amanda Forrest
29W–11L career · no lines in 2024
<1%21%79%
3.61
Stephanie Shah
49W–29L career · no lines in 2024
<1%47%53%
3.51
Linda Potts
19W–19L career · no lines in 2024
1%92%7%
3.30
Wincy Tomecko
11W–10L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Diane Scovell
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Jackie Fogle
4W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Amy McKinley
9W–15L career · no lines in 2024
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Claudine Vazquez
8W–7L career · no lines in 2024
6%93%1%
3.20
Joy Sebold
19W–32L career · no lines in 2024
6%93%1%
3.20
Julie Bullard
22W–20L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%<1%
3.16
3.5
Christine Marlowe
9W–11L career · no lines in 2024
21%78%<1%
3.10
3.5
Erin Baldwin
18W–10L career · no lines in 2024
27%73%<1%
3.08
Sandy Barrett Brown
1W–21L career · no lines in 2024
94%6%<1%
2.80
3
Diane Mizerany
6W–12L career · no lines in 2024
1%93%5%
2.79
3
Betty Park
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Juli Henley
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Katherine Hawkins
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Marianne Hark
14W–9L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.