Teams

Patriots

Fall Adult 18 & Over Tri-Level · Women 4.5, 4.0, 3.5

14 players · average NTRP 4.33 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-10-05vs Coup de TroisWon 21
W#1 DoublesSarah Bolin / Viktoriya Paul vs Morgan Wilkins / Jennifer Childress6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesHillary Crimm / Rebecca Stephens vs Amanda Romney / Jen Nelson4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJordan Preddy / Laura Kelley vs Sarah Park / Sarah Montgomery2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2025-10-05vs Tri-HarderWon 30
W#1 DoublesAshley Ingle / Christina Hiltscher vs BIBIANA ECHEVERRY RAIGOZA / Bethany Merchant6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAmber Jordan / Hillary Crimm vs Murphy Moon / Amy Mulvihill6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJennie Purushothaman / Chimene Welch vs Kathy Lampert / Jamie Allen6-0, 1-6, 1-0
2025-10-04vs Coup de TroisLost 12
W#1 DoublesDenise Arndt / Viktoriya Paul vs Morgan Wilkins / Jennifer Childress6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesStephanie Stephens / Amber Jordan vs Kim Hoang / Jen Nelson0-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJordan Preddy / Laura Kelley vs Sarah Montgomery / Sarah Park3-6, 6-7
2025-10-04vs Tri-HarderWon 20
W#1 DoublesAshley Ingle / Sarah Bolin vs Alanna Ely / Louisa Wang6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesLaura Kelley / Jordan Preddy vs Jamie Allen / Amanda Fults6-2, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 4.5, 4.0, 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.00 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.52
Viktoriya Paul
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.39
Sarah Bolin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.37
Christina Hiltscher
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.25
Ashley Ingle
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.17
Stephanie Stephens
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.14
Denise Arndt
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.01
Rebecca Stephens
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.96
Hillary Crimm
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.90
Amber Jordan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.88
Cherie Hall
published 4.5
3.63
Jordan Preddy
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.43
Chimene Welch
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.35
Jennie Purushothaman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Laura Kelley
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amber Jordan + Rebecca Stephens5254% games+13.8% vs expected
Ashley Ingle + Sarah Bolin15658% games+5.2% vs expected
Sarah Bolin + Cherie Hall4159% gamesnot enough data
Ashley Ingle + Cherie Hall044 matchesnot enough data
Sarah Bolin + Viktoriya Paul404 matchesnot enough data
Cherie Hall + Rebecca Stephens134 matchesnot enough data
Amber Jordan + Hillary Crimm314 matchesnot enough data
Amber Jordan + Stephanie Stephens033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Viktoriya Paul
88W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%45%55%
4.52
Sarah Bolin
68W–28L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
4.39
4.5
Christina Hiltscher
72W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%83%17%
4.37
4.5
Ashley Ingle
37W–39L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
4.25
Stephanie Stephens
8W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
12%87%1%
4.17
4.5
Denise Arndt
21W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
16%83%<1%
4.14
Rebecca Stephens
95W–52L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%46%54%
4.01
Hillary Crimm
105W–35L career · 2 lines in 2025
60%40%<1%
3.96
4.5
Amber Jordan
71W–80L career · 3 lines in 2025
75%25%<1%
3.90
4.5
Cherie Hall
24W–40L career · no lines in 2025
80%20%<1%
3.88
Jordan Preddy
43W–28L career · 3 lines in 2025
17%82%<1%
3.63
3.5
Chimene Welch
34W–61L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%69%31%
3.43
Jennie Purushothaman
81W–27L career · 1 line in 2025
1%85%14%
3.35
Laura Kelley
59W–41L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.