Teams

OC Los Cab - Tracy Sat1

2026 SCTA Adult 65 & Over - OC · OC Women 9.0 Super Seniors

11 players · average NTRP 4.30 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 upcoming · 2 played
Sep 12 1:00 PM
Los Cab Sports Club
Sep 20 1:00 PM
Laguna Woods Tennis Club
Sep 26 1:00 PM
Los Cab Sports Club
Oct 4 1:00 PM
Laguna Woods Tennis Club
2026-08-30vs OC Laguna Woods - Blanco - Sun1Lost 12
L#1 DoublesMary Konopa / Jackie Head vs Anne Nicholson / Elisabeth Marks2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesMoira O'Toole / Lajla Feichter vs Lily Wu / Sherryl Chaffin6-4, 6-0
L#3 DoublesCynthia Neiman / Diane Perryman vs Julie Juliani / Vicky Blanco0-6, 4-6
2026-08-22vs OC Laguna Woods - Blanco - Sun1Lost 12
W#1 DoublesMoira O'Toole / Lajla Feichter vs Elisabeth Marks / Kellie Jaquez6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesMary Konopa / Leslie Croyder vs Anne Nicholson / Yolanda Legro1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesKaren Haas / Jackie Head vs Colleen Scanlon / Vicky Blanco3-6, 1-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · OC Women 9.0 Super Seniors
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1OC Los Cab - Tracy Sat1000000
2OC Laguna Woods - Blanco - Sun1000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.11 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.58
Lea Inouye
published 5
4.45
Lajla Feichter
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.29
Moira O'Toole
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
4.26
Karen Haas
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
4.03
Mary Konopa
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
4.02
Leslie Croyder
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.91
Cynthia Neiman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.81
Diane Perryman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.69
Brenda Danielson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
Jackie Head
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Lisa Schantz
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lea Inouye + Cynthia Neiman10362% games+15.8% vs expected
Moira O'Toole + Lajla Feichter303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Lea Inouye
50W–17L career · no lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.58
4.5
Lajla Feichter
74W–30L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%64%36%
4.45
Moira O'Toole
11W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
4.29
Karen Haas
0W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
no projection at this level
4.26
Mary Konopa
7W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
42%58%<1%
4.03
Leslie Croyder
3W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
45%55%<1%
4.02
4
Cynthia Neiman
28W–27L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%74%26%
3.91
4
Diane Perryman
91W–104L career · 1 line in 2026
1%90%8%
3.81
4
Brenda Danielson
5W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
9%89%1%
3.69
Jackie Head
0W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Lisa Schantz
2W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.