Teams

SDNC 4.5 Kit Carson Park/ Buggs

2025 SoCal Fall Doubles WE · GNO- SDNC

14 players · average NTRP 4.61 / SAN DIEGO

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-11-09vs SDNC 4.5 SDTC/ MartinezWon 21
W#1 DoublesJack Zander / R Kyle Thompson vs Michael Hotti / Joseph Merrill6-4, 7-6
L#2 DoublesJeffrey Ford / Michael Iter vs Scott Malony / George Pritzker6-7, 5-7
W#3 DoublesTaylor Bryant / ALEXANDRE COLAS vs Erick Russell Elchico / Chris Fromme6-1, 3-1
2025-09-28vs SDNC LLW 4.5 Lomas Santa Fe/ BooneLost 03
L#1 DoublesR Kyle Thompson / Michael Iter vs Michael Garcia / Colin Palmer3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesTaylor Bryant / Robert Bryant vs Jacob Boone / Grant Watkins4-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesChad Basinger / Connor Lievers vs Alex Barnett / Todd Johansen3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for GNO- SDNC have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.40 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Alex Nemerov
published 5
4.72
Daniel Goldin
published 5
4.45
Jack Zander
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.42
ALEXANDRE COLAS
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.40
Bernie Buggs
published 4.5
Jacob Quijano
published 4.5
4.21
Bradin Simms
published 4.5
4.19
Chad Basinger
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Connor Lievers
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
Jeff Ray
published
Jeffrey Ford
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Michael Iter
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
R Kyle Thompson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Robert Bryant
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jeff Ray + Jeffrey Ford314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Alex Nemerov
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
5
Daniel Goldin
5W–3L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
4.72
5
Jack Zander
3W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
64%36%<1%
4.45
4.5
ALEXANDRE COLAS
15W–2L career · type A · 1 line in 2025
<1%72%28%
4.42
4.5
Bernie Buggs
155W–51L career · no lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
4.40
4.5
Jacob Quijano
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4.5
Bradin Simms
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
6%93%1%
4.21
4.5
Chad Basinger
4W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
7%92%1%
4.19
4
Connor Lievers
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Jeff Ray
20W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Jeffrey Ford
8W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Michael Iter
2W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
R Kyle Thompson
1W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Robert Bryant
2W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.