Teams

Tickner/18s/3.0/FAC Night

2025 Man · Cov Adult 18 & Over - Women Night

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-04-29Won 10
W#1 SinglesPatricia Borges vs Nela Otero3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-04-01Won 10
W#1 SinglesPatricia Borges vs Paula Thomas6-3, 6-3
2025-03-18Lost 02
L#1 SinglesPatricia Borges vs Jamie Quartano1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesSHELLY GALLARDO / Emily Tickner vs Jessica Smith / Christina Ward1-6, 1-6
2025-03-11vs Freeman/18s/3.0/NC NightSplit 11
L#1 DoublesDiane Satter / Patricia Borges vs Casey Culbreath / Sarah Mitchell1-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesEmily Tickner / Mary Grace Sherlock vs Kati Lebreton / Lynsie White6-1, 6-0
2025-02-25Lost 01
L#1 SinglesPatricia Borges vs Ann Boushie6-2, 1-6, 0-1
2025-02-15vs Freeman/18s/3.0/NC NightSplit 11
L#1 SinglesPatricia Borges vs Mignon Hess6-7, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 SinglesEmily Tickner vs Lindsay Pinell6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2025-02-11Won 10
W#1 SinglesPatricia Borges vs Marie Faucheux3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2025-01-28Lost 02
L#1 DoublesGail Miller / Emily Tickner vs Alison Beebe / Amanda Myers3-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesPatricia Borges vs Jamie Quartano1-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Cov Adult 18 & Over - Women Night have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.65 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Allison Harrison
published 3
2.66
Diane Satter
usually #1 Doubles 54%, also #2 Doubles 31% · published 3
2.63
Patricia Borges
usually #1 Singles 88%, also #1 Doubles 13% · published
Emily Tickner
usually #2 Singles 25%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Fran Dominique
usually #3 Doubles 48%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published
Gail Miller
usually #1 Doubles 61%, also #3 Doubles 28% · published
Kathy Tisdale
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Lara Berry
published
Mary Grace Sherlock
usually #2 Doubles 53%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Rita Rebouche
usually #1 Doubles 42%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
SHELLY GALLARDO
usually #2 Doubles 45%, also #3 Doubles 45% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

SHELLY GALLARDO + Rita Rebouche2539% gamesnot enough data
Gail Miller + Diane Satter1440% gamesnot enough data
Fran Dominique + Mary Grace Sherlock123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Allison Harrison
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Diane Satter
10W–27L career · 26 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
2.66
Patricia Borges
13W–11L career · 8 lines in 2025
0%17%83%
2.63
Emily Tickner
3W–3L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Fran Dominique
27W–26L career · 31 lines in 2025
not enough data
Gail Miller
24W–34L career · 36 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kathy Tisdale
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lara Berry
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Mary Grace Sherlock
9W–16L career · 15 lines in 2025
not enough data
Rita Rebouche
12W–23L career · 12 lines in 2025
not enough data
SHELLY GALLARDO
12W–49L career · 20 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.