← Teams

CAC-Lee/McCara

2024 Mixed 18 & Over · 8.0 Mixed

10 players · average NTRP 3.95 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.65 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.06
Mike Zielinski
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.79
Rudd McGarity
published 4.5
—
Adina Talpos
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.64
Scott Eliason
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.63
Tami McAra
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 44% · published 4
3.63
Sheng Saechao
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.58
Dongju Won
usually #3 Doubles 55%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published 4
3.49
Tony Khamsouk
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.36
Michele Snyder
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
—
Quyen Wong
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Results8 ties
2023-12-02Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesTami McAra / Scott Eliason vs Emily Vander Ploeg / Steve Vanderploeg6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesAdina Talpos / Mike Zielinski vs Abby van Amerongen / Adam Gamboa7-5, 6-3
2023-11-18Split 1–1
W#1 DoublesTami McAra / Scott Eliason vs Eddie Shin / Rachel Karlin6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAdina Talpos / Rudd McGarity vs Alex Rand / Halle Jackson6-2, 6-1
2023-11-04Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesTami McAra / Scott Eliason vs Suzie Glenn / Dan Tracy4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRudd McGarity / Adina Talpos vs Jonathan Caplan / Chanon Ogden6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesQuyen Wong / Jennie Brawn vs Anh Nguyen / Duy Nguyen6-2, 6-4
2023-10-22Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesSheng Saechao / Erin Hill vs Alex Young / ANN MILLER6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesQuyen Wong / Jennie Brawn vs Tuan Truong / Jeanette Thomas7-6, 7-5
W#3 DoublesRudd McGarity / Michele Snyder vs Claire Bell / Greg Bell6-4, 6-2
2023-10-14Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesRudd McGarity / Michele Snyder vs Mitchell Whitehurst / Molly Shum6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesScott Eliason / Tami McAra vs Stephen Crook / Minou Chau1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDongju Won / Tony Khamsouk vs Daniel Lamey / Julie Carmena6-7, 6-1, 1-0
2023-10-08Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesSheng Saechao / Dongju Won vs Roshen Warrier / Jean Herbst1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMike Zielinski / Erin Hill vs Danny Denning / Katrina Phillips5-7, 6-0, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTony Khamsouk / Jennie Brawn vs Edmund Yuan / Ashley Schneider3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-09-24Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesRudd McGarity / Adina Talpos vs Brad Johnson / Mary Bullard6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMike Zielinski / Tami McAra vs Steve Swan / Melissa Light6-1, 6-0
L#3 DoublesQuyen Wong / Jennie Brawn vs Jeroen Swanborn / Celene Robert7-5, 6-3
2023-09-09Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesTami McAra / Mike Zielinski vs Adam Bartlett / Kirsten Giacomini6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesDongju Won / Sheng Saechao vs Jeroen Swanborn / Sara Swanborn6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesErin Hill / Scott Eliason vs Juan Camilo Forero / Tracey Riddle6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Mike Zielinski
57W–38L career
0%65%35%
4.06
4.5
Rudd McGarity
33W–65L career
73%27%0%
3.79
4
Adina Talpos
31W–29L career
not enough data
—
4
Scott Eliason
67W–73L career
6%94%0%
3.64
4
Tami McAra
148W–117L career
6%94%0%
3.63
4
Sheng Saechao
72W–52L career
8%92%0%
3.63
4
Dongju Won
67W–50L career
16%84%0%
3.58
4
Tony Khamsouk
49W–115L career
37%63%0%
3.49
3.5
Michele Snyder
149W–123L career
0%97%2%
3.36
3.5
Quyen Wong
32W–29L career
not enough data
—

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.