Teams

Rosario 40s 8.5 Combo M Tues PM

2025 Piedmont Combo 40 & Over · 8.5 Men 40 Tues

13 players · average NTRP 4.31 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
W#1 DoublesBrooks Jackson / Peter Georges vs Mark Lapierre / Corey Davis7-5, 6-3
W#2 DoublesBryan Vescio / Art Fadde vs Kenny Winter / Rod Schwartz2-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAaron Anderson / Craig Freed vs Christopher Crouch / Rich Dowler3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2025-09-23vs Corthum 40s 8.5 Combo M Tues PMWon 21
L#1 DoublesBryan Vescio / Art Fadde vs Jay Hitchcock / Peter Novosad3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesCharlie Lambis / Craig Freed vs Chuck Burns / Charley Eberhard3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBrooks Jackson / Peter Georges vs David Leatherwood / Jeffrey Albright7-5, 6-2
L#1 DoublesBryan Vescio / Johan Nordmark vs Michael Davis / Rich Dowler3-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesCharlie Lambis / Peter Georges vs Stephen Keaney / Todd Palmer4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesAndy Rutledge / Craig Freed vs Kenny Winter / Rod Schwartz2-6, 4-6
2025-09-02vs Corthum 40s 8.5 Combo M Tues PMLost 12
W#1 DoublesBryan Vescio / Art Fadde vs David Leatherwood / Jeffrey Albright7-5, 7-6
L#2 DoublesPhilip Weikel / Charlie Lambis vs Christopher Bryce / Jay Hitchcock5-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesAaron Anderson / Johan Nordmark vs Lee Picklesimer / Peter Novosad4-6, 0-6
W#1 DoublesArt Fadde / Neil Henderson vs Andrew Hjelt / Ziad Fleihan6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesAndy Rutledge / Peter Georges vs Glenn Mosseller / Hal Browne2-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesCraig Freed / Charlie Lambis vs Neal Dorman / Matt Mallard2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#1 DoublesAaron Anderson / Philip Weikel vs Eric Anthony / Rod Schwartz4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesBrooks Jackson / Fred Bushnell vs Mark Lapierre / Brad Green6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesNeil Henderson / Peter Georges vs Christopher Crouch / Rich Dowler3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2025-08-12vs Corthum 40s 8.5 Combo M Tues PMWon 21
W#1 DoublesArt Fadde / Bryan Vescio vs Peter Novosad / Lee Picklesimer7-5, 7-5
W#2 DoublesJohan Nordmark / Charlie Lambis vs Jason Altmann / Chuck Burns7-5, 6-2
L#3 DoublesFred Bushnell / Andy Rutledge vs Jeffrey Albright / Jay Hitchcock7-6, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.5 Men 40 Tues have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.98 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.21
Andy Rutledge
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.21
Bryan Vescio
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
4.15
Neil Henderson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
4.13
Brooks Jackson
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.05
Aaron Anderson
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.04
Charlie Lambis
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
3.96
Art Fadde
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.89
Johan Nordmark
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.83
Philip Weikel
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.81
Peter Georges
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Fred Bushnell
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.46
Craig Freed
usually #3 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 4
Raymond Rosario
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Art Fadde + Bryan Vescio4153% games−1.6% vs expected
Charlie Lambis + Bryan Vescio2350% gamesnot enough data
Craig Freed + Charlie Lambis213 matchesnot enough data
Johan Nordmark + Andy Rutledge213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Andy Rutledge
9W–26L career · 3 lines in 2025
5%94%1%
4.21
4.5
Bryan Vescio
37W–17L career · 5 lines in 2025
5%94%1%
4.21
Neil Henderson
11W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
12%88%<1%
4.15
4.5
Brooks Jackson
15W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
16%83%<1%
4.13
4.5
Aaron Anderson
1W–7L career · type S · 3 lines in 2025
34%66%<1%
4.05
4.5
Charlie Lambis
11W–17L career · 5 lines in 2025
37%63%<1%
4.04
4
Art Fadde
45W–18L career · 15 lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
3.96
Johan Nordmark
14W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.89
Philip Weikel
6W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.83
Peter Georges
11W–9L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%92%7%
3.81
4
Fred Bushnell
2W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Craig Freed
11W–24L career · 8 lines in 2025
64%36%<1%
3.46
Raymond Rosario
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.