Teams

LA - Century City

2022 Weekday Spring Women's Doubles - Local League Only · LA - Women 4.0

14 players · average NTRP 4.17 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2022-06-16vs LA - MountainGateWon 10
W#2 DoublesDebra Holstein / Haleh Emrani vs Yolanda Zackler / Natalie Mahdesian6-1, 2-6, 1-0
2022-05-13vs LA - MountainGateWon 10
W#2 DoublesHaleh Emrani / Debra Holstein vs Karen Haltrecht / Adrienne Hwang6-4, 6-2
2022-05-05vs LA - The Dream TeamLost 01
L#2 DoublesHaleh Emrani / Martina Mass vs Amelia Bolker / Lisa Klingenberg5-7, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for LA - Women 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.61 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.30
Alexia Monti
published 4.5
3.90
Kelly Nielson
published 4.5
3.90
Stacie Smiley
published 4.5
3.81
Jeannette Hartsock
published
3.69
Susan Raifman
published
3.65
Martina Mass
published
3.65
Haleh Emrani
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.63
Helena Schwartz
published 4
3.48
Rachel Werner
published
3.45
S Arnold
published
3.35
Mary Kayne
published
3.31
Rachel Edwards
published
Debra Holstein
published 3.5
2.83
Lori Tenan
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kelly Nielson + Stacie Smiley562358% games+2.4% vs expected
S Arnold + Martina Mass1444% games−7.8% vs expected
Jeannette Hartsock + Martina Mass404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Alexia Monti
7W–2L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
4.30
4.5
Kelly Nielson
67W–30L career · no lines in 2022
77%23%<1%
3.90
4.5
Stacie Smiley
81W–36L career · no lines in 2022
78%22%<1%
3.90
Jeannette Hartsock
10W–5L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%8%
3.81
Susan Raifman
4W–5L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.69
Martina Mass
7W–11L career · no lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
3.65
4
Haleh Emrani
40W–64L career · 3 lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
3.65
4
Helena Schwartz
8W–12L career · no lines in 2022
17%83%<1%
3.63
Rachel Werner
6W–7L career · no lines in 2022
55%45%<1%
3.48
S Arnold
4W–12L career · no lines in 2022
<1%64%36%
3.45
Mary Kayne
1W–8L career · no lines in 2022
87%13%<1%
3.35
Rachel Edwards
4W–8L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%8%
3.31
3.5
Debra Holstein
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Lori Tenan
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
91%9%<1%
2.83

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.