Teams

SD LLW 3.5 Blue Dragons @PTC/ Flores

2023 Adult 18 & Over Spring - SD · SD - Men - 3.5

10 players · average NTRP 3.75 / SAN DIEGO

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2023-06-11vs SD 3.5 SDTRC (3:2)/ RussellWon 10
W#2 DoublesPIERRE CHATELAIN / Steve Potter vs Scott Trulove / John Wurster6-2, 6-1
2023-05-27vs SD 3.5 UCRC (2:3))/ ChinWon 10
W#2 DoublesSteve Potter / PIERRE CHATELAIN vs Keith Chin / Sang-Hun Kang7-6, 6-3
2023-05-21vs SD 3.5 CTC/ CHS (3@10: 2)/ KamasWon 10
W#3 DoublesPIERRE CHATELAIN / Steve Potter vs Justin Cook / Eric Traboulay7-6, 1-6, 1-0
2023-05-20vs SD 3.5 SDTRC (3:2)/ RussellWon 20
W#2 DoublesPIERRE CHATELAIN / Steve Potter vs Jeffrey Russell / KELVAN INCE6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesKirk Hensler vs William Witt6-1, 7-5
2023-05-06Won 10
W#3 DoublesPIERRE CHATELAIN / Steve Potter vs David Coria / John Hubert6-0, 6-1
2023-04-30vs SD 3.5 SDTRC (3:2)/ RussellSplit 11
L#1 SinglesKirk Hensler vs Jeffrey Russell2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesSteve Potter / PIERRE CHATELAIN vs John Masterson / John Wurster6-0, 6-2
2023-04-23vs SD 3.5 CTC/ CHS (3@10: 2)/ KamasLost 01
L#1 DoublesPIERRE CHATELAIN / Steve Potter vs Dave Werth / Scott Hart1-6, 4-6
2023-04-16vs SD 3.5 UCRC (2:3))/ ChinWon 20
W#1 DoublesPIERRE CHATELAIN / Steve Potter vs Christopher Lock / Keith Chin6-3, 6-2
W#1 SinglesKirk Hensler vs Peter Andersen6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2023-04-01vs SD 3.5 UCRC (2:3))/ ChinLost 01
L#2 DoublesSteve Potter / Jerome Chang vs Keith Chin / Chris Chessman1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SD - Men - 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.51 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.21
Kirk Hensler
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4.5
3.82
Philip Mykel Flores
published
3.58
PIERRE CHATELAIN
published
3.44
Ian Francis Viray
published 3.5
3.30
Chris Gardner
published 3.5
3.27
Jerome Chang
published
3.27
Steve Potter
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Charles Fortuno
published 3.5
3.23
William Carey
published
Tim Lacey
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Chris Gardner + Jerome Chang044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Kirk Hensler
78W–29L career · 3 lines in 2023
5%93%1%
4.21
Philip Mykel Flores
11W–1L career · no lines in 2023
1%91%8%
3.82
PIERRE CHATELAIN
1W–7L career · no lines in 2023
27%73%<1%
3.58
3.5
Ian Francis Viray
4W–10L career · no lines in 2023
<1%69%31%
3.44
3.5
Chris Gardner
3W–12L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.30
Jerome Chang
2W–11L career · no lines in 2023
96%4%<1%
3.27
Steve Potter
33W–80L career · 9 lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Charles Fortuno
3W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
William Carey
5W–6L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.23
Tim Lacey
2W–7L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.