Teams

EW-WCCP-Kim

2024 Mixed 18 & Over · 9.0

3 players · average NTRP 4.5 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / EASTERN WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 4.24 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.38
Tom Griner
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Dewey Kim
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.09
Chanel Nielsen
usually #2 Doubles 46%, also #1 Doubles 36% · published 4.5
Results4 ties
2023-10-15Lost 01
L#1 DoublesDewey Kim / Chanel Nielsen vs Kristin Larson / Andrew Hyink3-6, 6-1, 1-0
2023-10-15Split 11
L#1 DoublesDewey Kim / Chanel Nielsen vs Luke Thompson / Rathini Woodworth6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesTom Griner / Madalyn Williams vs Sean Singco / Chelsea Li6-4, 6-0
2023-10-14Won 20
W#2 DoublesMadalyn Williams / Tom Griner vs Maggie Fiocchi / Robbie Fiocchi6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMelissa Ching / Dewey Kim vs Sean Singco / Chelsea Li6-2, 7-5
2023-10-14Won 10
W#2 DoublesMadalyn Williams / Tom Griner vs Tyler van Horn / Stephanie Flowers6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5
Tom Griner
45W–15L career
0%77%23%
4.38
4.5
Dewey Kim
36W–28L career
not enough data
4.5
Chanel Nielsen
244W–118L career
3%97%0%
4.09

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.