Teams

Keaney 3.5W Fall Singles Mon PM

2025 Piedmont Fall Singles · 3.5 Women Fall Singles

6 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-10-20vs Dagger 3.5W Fall Singles Mon PMWon 21
W#1 SinglesEmily Mack vs Rosa Phillips6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesAlexa Smith vs Rebekah East6-2, 6-3
L#3 SinglesCackie Marsh vs Sandy Cathers4-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesAlexa Smith vs Suki Gutierrez6-1, 6-3
L#2 SinglesAllison Aldridge vs Paula Gebhard2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 SinglesCackie Marsh vs Jennifer Angelada6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesEmily Mack vs Paula Gebhard6-1, 6-2
W#3 SinglesStephanie Renn vs Suki Gutierrez1-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-09-08vs Dagger 3.5W Fall Singles Mon PMLost 12
W#1 SinglesEmily Mack vs Rebekah East6-2, 6-1
L#2 SinglesAllison Aldridge vs Sandy Cathers6-0, 5-7, 0-1
L#3 SinglesCackie Marsh vs Ashlyn Wilson2-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesEmily Mack vs Pam Fabros-Beuchat2-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesAlexa Smith vs Paula Gebhard7-5, 6-4
W#3 SinglesStephanie Renn vs Jennifer Angelada6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women Fall Singles have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.57
Emily Mack
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.17
Alexa Smith
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
3.17
Stephanie Renn
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
2.94
Catherine Martin
published 3
2.84
Allison Aldridge
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3
Cackie Marsh
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Allison Aldridge + Alexa Smith123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Emily Mack
26W–13L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%30%70%
3.57
3
Alexa Smith
30W–20L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%11%89%
3.17
Stephanie Renn
9W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
12%88%1%
3.17
3
Catherine Martin
7W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%65%34%
2.94
3
Allison Aldridge
5W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%87%13%
2.84
3
Cackie Marsh
3W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.