Teams

MTC Swanson 9:30am

2024 Women's Daytime Doubles · 3.5 Women

18 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTHERN

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.48
Pam Bowden
published
3.48
Mary Kennedy
published
3.42
Carrie Stolar
published 3.5
3.42
Heather Berg
published
3.41
Ellen Dobbins
published
3.35
Ruth Eliason
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
3.29
Heather Flies
published
3.27
Julie Whittington
published
3.27
Anna Rindt
published 3.5
3.20
Emily Scherschligt
published
3.16
Jenny Starkey
published
3.12
Petra Koehn
published
3.11
Nurcan Tosun
published
3.11
Leontine Larson
published
2.65
Wanda Makis
published
Kathy Houser
published
Lezlie Bork
published
Scott Swanson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ellen Dobbins + Carrie Stolar10259% games+8.4% vs expected
Julie Whittington + Nurcan Tosun8064% games+6.0% vs expected
Emily Scherschligt + Jenny Starkey5948% games+1.4% vs expected
Leontine Larson + Petra Koehn224 matchesnot enough data
Ellen Dobbins + Ruth Eliason314 matchesnot enough data
Ruth Eliason + Pam Bowden224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Pam Bowden
31W–16L career · no lines in 2024
<1%55%45%
3.48
Mary Kennedy
8W–19L career · no lines in 2024
<1%56%44%
3.48
3.5
Carrie Stolar
32W–18L career · no lines in 2024
<1%71%29%
3.42
Heather Berg
12W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%71%29%
3.42
Ellen Dobbins
50W–19L career · no lines in 2024
<1%74%26%
3.41
Ruth Eliason
263W–178L career · 12 lines in 2024
1%85%15%
3.35
Heather Flies
10W–8L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.29
Julie Whittington
28W–17L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Anna Rindt
22W–24L career · type A · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.27
Emily Scherschligt
8W–11L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.20
Jenny Starkey
5W–11L career · no lines in 2024
12%87%1%
3.16
Petra Koehn
3W–5L career · no lines in 2024
21%79%<1%
3.12
Nurcan Tosun
23W–17L career · no lines in 2024
<1%21%79%
3.11
Leontine Larson
6W–3L career · no lines in 2024
21%78%<1%
3.11
Wanda Makis
1W–3L career · no lines in 2024
14%85%1%
2.65
Kathy Houser
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Lezlie Bork
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Scott Swanson
0W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.