Teams

RTC SHEKHAR/WILSON

2025 FW USTA Adult Fall - Men N · A

13 players · average NTRP 4.00 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2024-11-16vs RTC MYERSLost 02
L#1 SinglesMitchell Rehak vs Edgar Martinez7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJavier Cid / Kul Shekhar vs Srinivasan Subramanian / Vikram Balasubramanian6-7, 3-6
2024-10-26vs TCU HALLWon 21
W#1 DoublesMitchell Rehak / Freddy Grether vs Theodore Hackney / Tim Amato6-4, 6-3
W#1 SinglesKul Shekhar vs Travis Satterfield6-1, 6-0
L#3 DoublesJavier Cid / Kalen Gunderson vs Curtis Studey / Ziaul Ahmed3-6, 4-6
2024-10-19vs CCC PITTSLost 12
L#1 DoublesKalen Gunderson / Javier Cid vs Nicolas Hutnyak / Marc Chase3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesMitchell Rehak / Freddy Grether vs Robb Catalano / Richard Stevens6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesKul Shekhar / Lowell Perkins vs Clif Wiegand / Michael ONeil3-6, 3-6
2024-10-12vs ATC GLANDONWon 30
W#1 DoublesKalen Gunderson / Javier Cid vs Wade Glandon / Ernest Resma6-2, 6-2
W#1 SinglesKul Shekhar vs Alton Thomson6-0, 6-4
W#2 DoublesMitchell Rehak / Edgar Ayala vs Loc Dao / Carson Blevins6-3, 6-4
2024-10-05vs RID DELKWon 10
W#1 DoublesFreddy Grether / Mitchell Rehak vs David Delk / Brian Young6-1, 4-6, 1-0
2024-09-28vs HTC GUASALost 12
W#1 DoublesMitchell Rehak / Freddy Grether vs Jonathan MacEda / Andrew Steinbeck6-0, 6-2
L#1 SinglesKul Shekhar vs Tuan Ngo1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesKalen Gunderson / Sam Nunez vs Jory Opp / Andras Bocsardi1-6, 3-6
2024-09-21vs WAL WOODYWon 20
W#1 DoublesFreddy Grether / Mitchell Rehak vs Jeff Lawless / Jeff Mccurdy7-6, 6-4
W#1 SinglesKul Shekhar vs Bill Armfield6-7, 6-0
2024-09-14vs WAG MAYERLost 02
L#1 SinglesMitchell Rehak vs Andy Chapa4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKul Shekhar / Freddy Grether vs Harish Rangarajan / Roy Joseph5-7, 2-6
2024-09-07vs BIR CHRISTIANSENWon 20
W#1 SinglesMitchell Rehak vs Davis Baker6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKalen Gunderson / Kul Shekhar vs Carlos Lopez / Robert Fisher6-7, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings14 teams · A
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CCC PITTS9028820258
2RID DELK81261023247
3HTC GUASA72211536310
4WAG MAYER63211533286
5MCL WHATLEY/RIVERA63211534303
6RTC WEBSTER (scorpions)54231333290
7CHS LINKER (Avg. Joes)54221433310
8RTC SHEKHAR/WILSON45181841323
9SSP STIREWALT45171943340
10RTC MYERS45171943362
11TCU HALL27142249366
12WAL WOODY27102657374
13ATC GLANDON1872960393
14BIR CHRISTIANSEN0972963404

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.65 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.94
Praveen Reddypalli
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.88
Freddy Grether
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.88
Mitchell Rehak
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Brandon Sheppard
published 4
3.75
Edgar Ayala
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 31% · published 4
3.71
Kul Shekhar
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
3.63
Allan Wilson
usually #3 Doubles 46%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published 4
3.61
Ricardo Negron
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
3.58
Kalen Gunderson
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.56
Javier Cid
usually #1 Doubles 54%, also #2 Doubles 23% · published
3.31
Kyle Carney
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.27
Lowell Perkins
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Sam Nunez
usually #1 Doubles 42%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Freddy Grether + Mitchell Rehak7164% games+10.0% vs expected
Ricardo Negron + Edgar Ayala9557% games−2.3% vs expected
Ricardo Negron + Kul Shekhar2342% games−7.8% vs expected
Kalen Gunderson + Javier Cid3252% gamesnot enough data
Kyle Carney + Allan Wilson224 matchesnot enough data
Allan Wilson + Javier Cid134 matchesnot enough data
Praveen Reddypalli + Javier Cid404 matchesnot enough data
Kalen Gunderson + Lowell Perkins213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Praveen Reddypalli
9W–8L career · 6 lines in 2025
69%31%<1%
3.94
4
Freddy Grether
15W–7L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
3.88
Mitchell Rehak
16W–11L career · 9 lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
3.88
4
Brandon Sheppard
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Edgar Ayala
26W–11L career · 16 lines in 2025
3%95%3%
3.75
Kul Shekhar
31W–21L career · 8 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.71
4
Allan Wilson
16W–21L career · 11 lines in 2025
16%84%<1%
3.63
Ricardo Negron
22W–16L career · 14 lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.61
Kalen Gunderson
19W–15L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%28%72%
3.58
Javier Cid
21W–20L career · 13 lines in 2025
32%68%<1%
3.56
Kyle Carney
5W–9L career · 5 lines in 2025
92%8%<1%
3.31
Lowell Perkins
9W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
2%94%4%
3.27
Sam Nunez
9W–7L career · 12 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.