Teams

MERVYN MORRIS PK CM9.5A

2025 COMBO · Men 9.5

21 players · average NTRP 4.72 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Men 9.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.24 estimated across 19 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

David Hauser
published 5
4.74
4.73
Calvin Spanbauer
published 5
4.65
Brook Workeneh
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.57
Adam Duong
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.57
Sanjeev Sinha
published
4.52
Joshua Duong
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.34
Arjun Rihan
published 4.5
4.31
Sean Dizon
published
4.26
Roman Olmos
published
Adhitya Mohan
published 4.5
4.24
Stephen Flynn
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
4.23
Alex Kaiser
published 4.5
4.19
Khiem Tran
published
4.15
Nicholas Saquilayan
published
4.15
Nathan Gong
published
4.09
Phil Beilin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.98
Kevin Lowe
published
3.89
Michael Dong
published
3.66
Cesar Hernandez
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.25
Jason Wong
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nathan Gong + Alex Kaiser303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
David Hauser
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
5
Christopher Belloli
3W–0L career · no lines in 2025
3%94%2%
4.74
5
Calvin Spanbauer
2W–4L career · type S · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
4.73
5
Brook Workeneh
8W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
12%88%<1%
4.65
5
Adam Duong
4W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
28%71%<1%
4.57
Sanjeev Sinha
6W–5L career · no lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
4.57
Joshua Duong
13W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
44%56%<1%
4.52
4.5
Arjun Rihan
13W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%89%10%
4.34
Sean Dizon
6W–6L career · no lines in 2025
92%8%<1%
4.31
Roman Olmos
13W–9L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%3%
4.26
4.5
Adhitya Mohan
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Stephen Flynn
27W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%94%2%
4.24
4.5
Alex Kaiser
13W–4L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
4.23
Khiem Tran
9W–5L career · no lines in 2025
7%92%1%
4.19
Nicholas Saquilayan
10W–9L career · no lines in 2025
12%88%<1%
4.15
Nathan Gong
11W–12L career · no lines in 2025
13%87%<1%
4.15
Phil Beilin
1W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
24%76%<1%
4.09
Kevin Lowe
11W–3L career · no lines in 2025
56%44%<1%
3.98
Michael Dong
15W–6L career · no lines in 2025
80%20%<1%
3.89
4
Cesar Hernandez
2W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
11%88%<1%
3.66
Jason Wong
0W–4L career · no lines in 2025
100%0%0%
3.25

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.