Teams

Net Assets

2024 40&Over Women Spring · Summer

25 players · average NTRP 3.33 / NEW JERSEY REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-06-13vs Stop The LobSplit 22
L#1 DoublesKaren Donahue / Kim O'Boyle vs Suzanne Crosby / Jacylene Holloway3-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesTerri Hill vs Barbara Konrad3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesHope Olenyik / Kimberley Herman vs Nancy Lasher / Jennifer Sharpe5-7, 6-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJackie Barber / Kerry Sepe vs DARLENE DER / Nicole Egan6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2024-06-06vs Monmouth: Notorious NinjasLost 13
W#1 DoublesKim O'Boyle / Dawn Petillo vs Sarah Chin / Kristen Striano6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesTerri Hill vs Donna Pflug1-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKerry Sepe / Esabel Monteiro vs Lori Bennett / Carolyn Stanyek0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesDarleen Fiorelli / Andrea Egan vs Amy Chrebet / Keiko Gendi3-6, 6-7
2024-06-04vs Stop The LobLost 13
L#1 DoublesBarbara Laustsen / Dawn Petillo vs Suzanne Crosby / Jacylene Holloway3-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesJennifer Escava vs Meegan Fitzgerald6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesLori Billyard / Ellen Mastroberti vs Jennifer Sharpe / Nancy Lasher1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMarie Fahs / Megan Loewenberg vs Mary Walsh / Lauren Guarcello1-6, 3-6
2024-05-31vs Monmouth: Notorious NinjasLost 12
L#1 DoublesBarbara Laustsen / Tami Sasala vs Lori Bennett / Kristen Striano7-6, 3-5, 1-0
L#1 SinglesNorma Stojanovski vs Tina Wong0-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesJackie Barber / Susie Greenfeig vs Lanae Herman / Jaime Shapiro1-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-05-23vs Stop The LobLost 13
L#1 DoublesKimberley Herman / Barbara Laustsen vs Suzanne Crosby / Jacylene Holloway3-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesTerri Hill vs DARLENE DER6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesAndrea Egan / Megan Loewenberg vs Nancy Lasher / Jennifer Sharpe2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesDawn Petillo / Susie Greenfeig vs Barbara Konrad / Meegan Fitzgerald2-6, 4-6
2024-05-16vs Monmouth: Notorious NinjasWon 31
W#1 DoublesKim O'Boyle / Barbara Laustsen vs Dima Mousselli / Kristen Striano6-2, 6-0
W#1 SinglesTerri Hill vs Simona Satruc3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKimberley Herman / Tami Sasala vs Amy Greenberg / Amy Chrebet6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJill Schulz / Lucia Marchetta vs Laureena McCormack / Victoria Reznik0-6, 0-6
2024-05-09vs Monmouth: Notorious NinjasLost 13
L#1 DoublesKaren Donahue / Andrea Egan vs Sarah Chin / Carolyn Stanyek0-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesJennifer Escava vs Donna Pflug2-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesDawn Petillo / Esabel Monteiro vs Lori Bennett / Brenda Rollings7-6, 5-3
L#3 DoublesLori Billyard / Kathleen Wallace vs Soo Kim / Tina Wong1-6, 3-6
2024-05-02vs Stop The LobLost 13
L#1 DoublesKaren Donahue / Tami Sasala vs Mary Walsh / Tracy Nitche5-7, 3-5
W#1 SinglesTerri Hill vs Lisa Huch6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSusie Greenfeig / Jackie Barber vs Michelle Prager / Jennifer Sharpe5-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesBarbara Laustsen / Teri Lalima vs Lauren Guarcello / Amy Pham7-5, 1-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Summer have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.98 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.35
Karen Donahue
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.32
Tami Sasala
published 3.5
3.23
Andrea Egan
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.20
Dawn Petillo
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.19
Barbara Laustsen
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.05
Terri Hill
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.04
Susie Greenfeig
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.00
Kerry Sepe
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.97
Hope Olenyik
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.94
Kimberley Herman
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.90
Jennifer Escava
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.83
Esabel Monteiro
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.82
Jill Schulz
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.80
Lucia Marchetta
published 3
2.79
Megan Loewenberg
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.78
Norma Stojanovski
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.51
Darleen Fiorelli
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Ellen Mastroberti
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Jackie Barber
published
Kathleen Wallace
published
Kim O'Boyle
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Lori Billyard
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Marie Fahs
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Suzee Krebs
published
Teri Lalima
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kerry Sepe + Susie Greenfeig5452% games+6.8% vs expected
Kerry Sepe + Megan Loewenberg4157% games+4.0% vs expected
Hope Olenyik + Kimberley Herman12554% games+2.2% vs expected
Barbara Laustsen + Jackie Barber14459% games+1.2% vs expected
Tami Sasala + Karen Donahue542162% games−0.3% vs expected
Jackie Barber + Susie Greenfeig9258% games−2.0% vs expected
Barbara Laustsen + Kim O'Boyle8755% games−4.1% vs expected
Jill Schulz + Lucia Marchetta4544% games−12.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Karen Donahue
85W–38L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%85%14%
3.35
3.5
Tami Sasala
139W–59L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Andrea Egan
49W–56L career · 3 lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Dawn Petillo
51W–36L career · 4 lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.20
3.5
Barbara Laustsen
54W–38L career · 5 lines in 2024
9%89%1%
3.19
Terri Hill
62W–75L career · 5 lines in 2024
37%63%<1%
3.05
Susie Greenfeig
35W–28L career · 3 lines in 2024
39%61%<1%
3.04
Kerry Sepe
46W–40L career · 2 lines in 2024
51%49%<1%
3.00
Hope Olenyik
27W–28L career · 1 line in 2024
57%43%<1%
2.97
Kimberley Herman
20W–11L career · 3 lines in 2024
67%33%<1%
2.94
Jennifer Escava
4W–14L career · 2 lines in 2024
76%24%<1%
2.90
Esabel Monteiro
15W–17L career · 2 lines in 2024
89%11%<1%
2.83
Jill Schulz
89W–57L career · 1 line in 2024
1%89%10%
2.82
3
Lucia Marchetta
100W–87L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%8%
2.80
Megan Loewenberg
33W–37L career · 2 lines in 2024
2%91%7%
2.79
Norma Stojanovski
34W–62L career · 1 line in 2024
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Darleen Fiorelli
16W–40L career · 1 line in 2024
47%53%<1%
2.51
Ellen Mastroberti
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Jackie Barber
52W–25L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Kathleen Wallace
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Kim O'Boyle
32W–23L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Lori Billyard
1W–7L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Marie Fahs
16W–24L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Suzee Krebs
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Teri Lalima
8W–10L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.