Teams

JCC - Pho Phighters

2026 HTA Fall Thursday Men's Doubles · 4.0 Men

17 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings14 teams · 4.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1New Territory - Lobsters000000
2Sienna - Slicers000000
3Cinco Ranch Rosewood - Katy Challengers000000
4MPTC - Double Trouble000000
5AD IN - Warriors000000
6MPTC - Thor000000
7JCC - Pho Phighters000000
8LLTC - Double Trouble000000
9LLTC - Z Nation000000
10Arbor Park at Cross Creek - Serve-ivors000000
11Missouri City - Wideman000000
12Lost Forest - Natural Guts000000
13Kluge - Thunder-Smash000000
14Peckham Park - Dragons000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.37 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
Trung Nguyen
published
3.66
Shingo Higuchi
published
3.51
Juan Guzman
published
3.47
Pradeep Golla
published
3.43
Tuhin Pankaj
published
3.42
John Villarreal
published
3.40
Asad Qureshi
published 3.5
3.34
Khoa Dao
published
3.33
Jason Huang
published
3.33
3.27
Phi Dao
published
3.26
Scott Dorfman
published
Duy Nguyen
published 3.5
3.24
Ali Valji
published 3.5
3.10
Huy Tang
published 3.5
3.04
Bradley Fingeroot
published 3.5
Paul Nguyen
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Juan Guzman + John Villarreal5165% games+13.8% vs expected
Duy Nguyen + Jason Huang6455% games+7.1% vs expected
John Villarreal + Duy Nguyen3256% games+6.2% vs expected
John Villarreal + Tuhin Pankaj8752% games+5.1% vs expected
John Villarreal + Jason Huang3452% games+2.5% vs expected
Asad Qureshi + Tuhin Pankaj213 matchesnot enough data
Asad Qureshi + Bradley Fingeroot213 matchesnot enough data
Scott Dorfman + Phi Dao123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Trung Nguyen
34W–10L career · no lines in 2026
<1%3%97%
3.75
Shingo Higuchi
13W–12L career · no lines in 2026
11%88%<1%
3.66
Juan Guzman
14W–16L career · no lines in 2026
<1%46%54%
3.51
Pradeep Golla
5W–1L career · no lines in 2026
<1%60%40%
3.47
Tuhin Pankaj
24W–23L career · no lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
3.43
John Villarreal
26W–27L career · no lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
3.42
3.5
Asad Qureshi
9W–12L career · type S · no lines in 2026
<1%78%21%
3.40
Khoa Dao
14W–12L career · no lines in 2026
<1%88%12%
3.34
Jason Huang
31W–32L career · no lines in 2026
<1%89%10%
3.33
3.5
Farley Hernandez Yepez
6W–3L career · type S · no lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.33
Phi Dao
10W–12L career · no lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.27
Scott Dorfman
3W–13L career · no lines in 2026
2%95%3%
3.26
3.5
Duy Nguyen
21W–22L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
3.5
Ali Valji
6W–11L career · no lines in 2026
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Huy Tang
2W–2L career · type S · no lines in 2026
21%78%<1%
3.10
3.5
Bradley Fingeroot
5W–10L career · type S · no lines in 2026
38%62%<1%
3.04
Paul Nguyen
2W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.