Teams

Jossi-Tennis

2021 ADULT 40 & OVER SUMMER · 3.5 Men

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTHERN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2021-07-07vs Hassenstab - Fed ExpressWon 10
W#2 DoublesWilliam Schiller / Michael Tennis vs SCOTT HOWARD / Scott Weiland6-2, 5-7, 1-0
2021-06-23vs Fling Double TroubleWon 10
W#2 DoublesFrank Jossi / William Schiller vs Stefan Lucyk / Nicholas Lim6-3, 6-3
2021-06-16vs BigbyLost 01
L#1 DoublesJohn Carnahan / William Schiller vs Timothy Orgeman / Rick Hancks1-6, 1-6
2021-05-19vs Hassenstab - Fed ExpressWon 10
W#1 DoublesJohn Carnahan / William Schiller vs Mike Hicks / Robert Munoz6-4, 6-2
2021-05-12vs WarnkeLost 01
L#1 DoublesFrank Jossi / William Schiller vs Wilfert Long / Alistair Jacques4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.61
Luis Laguna
published
3.55
Eric Dieperink
published 3.5
3.48
William Schiller
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.40
Olivier Haise
published
3.31
Jason Ross
published
BINH TRAN
published 3.5
3.24
Michael Tennis
published
3.23
Chuck Tatsuda
published 3.5
3.23
Timothy Lynch
published
3.21
John Carnahan
published
3.15
Frank Jossi
published 3.5
3.06
Richard Rosenberg
published
3.01
Joseph Goswitz
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michael Tennis + Eric Dieperink5350% games−3.1% vs expected
Joseph Goswitz + Richard Rosenberg1442% games−3.3% vs expected
Chuck Tatsuda + Richard Rosenberg0531% games−11.8% vs expected
Jason Ross + Eric Dieperink2353% gamesnot enough data
John Carnahan + Frank Jossi213 matchesnot enough data
John Carnahan + Chuck Tatsuda213 matchesnot enough data
John Carnahan + Timothy Lynch213 matchesnot enough data
John Carnahan + Richard Rosenberg033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Luis Laguna
13W–16L career · no lines in 2021
19%80%<1%
3.61
3.5
Eric Dieperink
22W–18L career · type A · no lines in 2021
<1%34%66%
3.55
William Schiller
87W–77L career · 5 lines in 2021
<1%56%44%
3.48
Olivier Haise
31W–27L career · no lines in 2021
<1%77%23%
3.40
Jason Ross
16W–23L career · no lines in 2021
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
BINH TRAN
1W–4L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Michael Tennis
27W–26L career · no lines in 2021
3%95%2%
3.24
3.5
Chuck Tatsuda
18W–35L career · no lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.23
Timothy Lynch
9W–7L career · no lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.23
John Carnahan
17W–18L career · no lines in 2021
5%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Frank Jossi
13W–18L career · no lines in 2021
12%88%<1%
3.15
Richard Rosenberg
6W–25L career · no lines in 2021
32%68%<1%
3.06
Joseph Goswitz
7W–17L career · no lines in 2021
48%52%<1%
3.01

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.