Teams

Fjelstad/Trevino 7.0 18+MX W23

2023 Mixed 18 & Over Winter · 7.0 Mx

15 players · average NTRP 3.33 / NORTHERN

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-03-18Won 10
W#3 DoublesTia Fjelstad / Alejandro Trevino vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-02-26vs Ostlund- Per-Shaped 7.0 18+MX W23Won 10
W#2 DoublesAlejandro Trevino / Angel Nasrabadi vs Alexander Tang / Beth Ann Sloan6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2023-02-05vs Bartz- Mix It Up 7.0 18+MX W23Won 10
W#2 DoublesJessica Tollefson / Alejandro Trevino vs Rachel Lund / Andrei Kittelson6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesScott Krohn / Ellen Boss Krohn vs Kathy Burns / Dennis Lohmann6-1, 6-1
2023-01-22vs Wolson 7.0 18+MX W23Won 10
W#2 DoublesScott Krohn / Beth Snyder vs Norman Abramson / Leeann Bell6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesScott Krohn / Jessica Tollefson vs Amy Tjornhom / Tad Tjornhom6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesTia Fjelstad / Alejandro Trevino vs Elizabeth Olig / Cameron Olig6-2, 7-6
2023-01-08vs Toleu- Racqueteers 7.0 18+MX W23Lost 02
L#2 DoublesJessica Tollefson / Alejandro Trevino vs T.J. Majdecki / Michelle Finley1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesScott Krohn / Beth Snyder vs Karla Toleu / PETER SWANN7-5, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Mx have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.45 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.12
Doug Roseth
published
3.83
KJ Lynch
published
3.55
Angel Nasrabadi
published 4
3.40
Amy Lin
published 3.5
3.35
Sam Auyoung
published
3.23
Oscar Oboza
published
3.17
Alejandro Trevino
usually #3 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.93
Beth Snyder
published 3
Azita Bernet
published 3
Barbie Newhouse
published 3
Ellen Boss Krohn
published
Jessica Tollefson
published
Scott Krohn
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Sean Koo
published
Tia Fjelstad
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Doug Roseth
31W–6L career · no lines in 2023
19%81%<1%
4.12
KJ Lynch
31W–11L career · no lines in 2023
1%87%12%
3.83
4
Angel Nasrabadi
37W–28L career · no lines in 2023
35%65%<1%
3.55
3.5
Amy Lin
37W–11L career · no lines in 2023
<1%75%25%
3.40
Sam Auyoung
11W–15L career · no lines in 2023
1%85%14%
3.35
Oscar Oboza
25W–23L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Alejandro Trevino
221W–280L career · 9 lines in 2023
12%87%1%
3.17
3
Beth Snyder
2W–12L career · no lines in 2023
<1%69%31%
2.93
3
Azita Bernet
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Barbie Newhouse
0W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Ellen Boss Krohn
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Jessica Tollefson
11W–8L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Scott Krohn
81W–45L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
Sean Koo
0W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Tia Fjelstad
0W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.