Teams

DENNY

2025 USTA 60 & OVER TEAM INVITATIONAL · 4.0 PLUS WOMEN

9 players · average NTRP 3.75 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-05-17vs Henderson/Osborne-FetzLost 12
L#1 DoublesSandra Wickline / Rose Shuck vs Ann Schmitt / Terri Stone1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Montgomery / Ellen Miller vs Sally Osborn / Patty Coakley6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLori Brunner / Lita Leavell vs Jan Weimer / Kathy Stich0-6, 2-6
2025-05-17vs Lexington/MartinWon 21
L#1 DoublesRose Shuck / Ellen Miller vs Vanessa Dixon / Mary Cole2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Montgomery / Lori Brunner vs Ann Hays / Elizabeth Sanders6-4, 7-6
W#3 DoublesKASSIE KESSINGER / Lita Leavell vs Pam Blackwell / Robin Fergusson6-0, 6-1
2025-05-16vs Louisville/MedleyLost 03
L#1 DoublesRose Shuck / Ellen Miller vs Melody Medley / Ellen Baldwin1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Montgomery / Sandra Wickline vs Maria Shaw / Patricia Smith2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesLori Brunner / KASSIE KESSINGER vs Amy Dishman / Judith Eckman0-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 PLUS WOMEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.59 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.86
Beth Mendenhall
published 4
3.80
Rose Shuck
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.75
Elizabeth Montgomery
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.63
KASSIE KESSINGER
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.62
Lori Brunner
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.58
Sandra Wickline
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.25
Ellen Miller
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.25
Ann Denny
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Lita Leavell
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Beth Mendenhall
9W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
3.86
Rose Shuck
10W–35L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%91%8%
3.80
Elizabeth Montgomery
24W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%4%96%
3.75
KASSIE KESSINGER
16W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%18%82%
3.63
Lori Brunner
19W–26L career · 3 lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.62
Sandra Wickline
4W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
28%72%<1%
3.58
Ellen Miller
7W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
96%4%<1%
3.25
3.5
Ann Denny
9W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.25
Lita Leavell
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.