Teams

CP YELLOW

2023 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - TWILIGHT

8 players · average NTRP 3.40 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-08-28vs CACM GREENSplit 11
W#1 DoublesCarolyn Welter / Annie Rapson vs Tandy Dilworth / Elizabeth Walker6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesKatie Kennedy / Ashley Banister-Riley vs Mary Deluccia / Carrie Steuart3-6, 4-6
2023-08-23vs WP PINKWon 10
W#1 DoublesCarolyn Welter / Katie Kennedy vs Audrey Hamilton / Michela Zafferani6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2023-08-21vs JCC GREENLost 02
L#1 DoublesAnnie Rapson / Stephanie Sims vs Brooke O'Drobinak / Theress Pidick4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesCatherine Hance / Carolyn Welter vs MacAyla Hansen / Kimi Davis3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2023-08-07vs CP PURPLEWon 10
W#1 DoublesAshley Banister-Riley / Carolyn Welter vs Jodi Denton / Alexandra Hopkins6-3, 6-4
2023-07-24vs APR-MH ORANGEWon 10
W#1 DoublesKatie Kennedy / Ashley Banister-Riley vs Tori Ciucci-Walley / Hilary Morgan6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - TWILIGHT have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.41 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.88
Kelly Connor
published
3.53
Carrie Lee
published 3.5
3.52
Annie Rapson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.42
Ashley Banister-Riley
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.30
Carolyn Welter
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.18
Stephanie Sims
published
3.08
Katie Kennedy
published
Catherine Hance
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Annie Rapson + Ashley Banister-Riley20560% games+6.9% vs expected
Katie Kennedy + Annie Rapson5156% games+6.5% vs expected
Katie Kennedy + Stephanie Sims224 matchesnot enough data
Annie Rapson + Stephanie Sims303 matchesnot enough data
Ashley Banister-Riley + Stephanie Sims213 matchesnot enough data
Carolyn Welter + Stephanie Sims123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kelly Connor
7W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%81%19%
3.88
3.5
Carrie Lee
19W–1L career · no lines in 2023
<1%41%59%
3.53
3.5
Annie Rapson
46W–11L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%45%55%
3.52
3.5
Ashley Banister-Riley
69W–54L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%72%27%
3.42
3.5
Carolyn Welter
34W–20L career · 4 lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.30
Stephanie Sims
13W–6L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.18
Katie Kennedy
13W–10L career · no lines in 2023
27%73%<1%
3.08
3
Catherine Hance
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.