Teams

Cedars Island Girls

2024 Sarasota Adult 40 & Over Spring Weekday · 4.0 W Tuesday

12 players · average NTRP 3.90 / REGION_5

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-06-04vs Laurel Oak RosenthalLost 01
L#2 DoublesKarin Buffett / Kelly Ochsenreiter vs Julie Sparma / Danielle Thorpe5-7, 6-7
2024-05-28Won 10
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Scheible / Lisa Tyson vs Roda Rucks / Cynthia Norwood6-3, 6-4
2024-05-23vs Plantation DipierroLost 02
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Scheible / Jackie Dedrick vs Kerry Distefano / Marjorie Petruccelli2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesLisa Tyson / Karin Buffett vs Diane DeGurian / Patricia Dipierro3-6, 3-6
2024-05-21vs LWR Rain RanchersLost 01
L#3 DoublesCherie Lopez / Karin Buffett vs Lisa Tschetter / Carol Kloeppel2-6, 6-7
2024-05-14vs Mission Valley Mooney/AbleWon 10
W#1 DoublesVickie Miller / Elizabeth Scheible vs Sandra Mooney / Lori Clark6-2, 6-3
2024-04-30vs LWR McAloonLost 01
L#3 DoublesCherie Lopez / Karin Buffett vs Christie Uihlein / Sheila Perry3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2024-04-23vs Sarasota/Caldwell/40&Over4.0WLost 01
L#3 DoublesLori Brochin / Elizabeth Scheible vs Colleen Shoemaker / Lauren Wohlwend2-6, 5-7
2024-04-02Won 10
W#3 DoublesJackie Dedrick / Elizabeth Scheible vs Cindy Wilson-Snyder / Christine Tocco4-6, 6-0, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 W Tuesday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.78 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.13
Lori Brochin
published
3.95
Dana Slackman
published 4
3.85
Cathy Maler
published 4
3.76
Kristin Knous
published
Brenda Baril
published 4
3.69
Jackie Dedrick
published
3.66
Elizabeth Scheible
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.42
Deanna Rollyson
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Karin Buffett
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Linda Gillott
published
Lisa Tyson
published
Vickie Miller
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Karin Buffett + Linda Gillott123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lori Brochin
6W–8L career · no lines in 2024
18%81%<1%
4.13
4
Dana Slackman
38W–33L career · no lines in 2024
<1%63%37%
3.95
4
Cathy Maler
11W–6L career · no lines in 2024
1%85%14%
3.85
Kristin Knous
10W–3L career · no lines in 2024
3%93%4%
3.76
4
Brenda Baril
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Jackie Dedrick
4W–3L career · no lines in 2024
8%90%1%
3.69
4
Elizabeth Scheible
38W–32L career · 5 lines in 2024
12%87%1%
3.66
3.5
Deanna Rollyson
39W–33L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%72%28%
3.42
Karin Buffett
22W–25L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Linda Gillott
23W–28L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Lisa Tyson
0W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Vickie Miller
4W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.