Teams

LCTA18/Clinch/CTC

LCTA 18 & Over Fall League · 18 & over Fall League Men 3.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 18 & over Fall League Men 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.80 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.02
Stephen Clinch
published
3.01
Danny Ferro
published 3
2.92
Andrew Froncillo
published 3
2.88
Jack Mraz
published
2.77
Mark Warner
published
2.76
Jeremy Billew
published
2.74
David Angell
published 3
2.72
Blair Holloway
published 3
2.65
2.64
2.63
Michael Pigue
published
Jonathan Young
published
Ryan Robinson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mark Warner + Andrew Froncillo3350% games+6.3% vs expected
Jeremy Billew + Stephen Clinch123 matchesnot enough data
Jeremy Billew + Jack Mraz033 matchesnot enough data
Stephen Clinch + Blair Holloway213 matchesnot enough data
Blair Holloway + David Angell123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Stephen Clinch
40W–35L career · no lines in 2026
<1%43%57%
3.02
3
Danny Ferro
7W–8L career · type S · no lines in 2026
<1%48%52%
3.01
3
Andrew Froncillo
13W–28L career · no lines in 2026
<1%71%29%
2.92
Jack Mraz
23W–17L career · no lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
2.88
Mark Warner
38W–55L career · no lines in 2026
3%92%5%
2.77
Jeremy Billew
19W–23L career · no lines in 2026
3%93%4%
2.76
3
David Angell
5W–4L career · no lines in 2026
4%93%3%
2.74
3
Blair Holloway
8W–17L career · no lines in 2026
6%92%2%
2.72
3
Christopher Skorke
2W–2L career · type S · no lines in 2026
14%85%1%
2.65
3
Bryan Fitzsimmons
2W–2L career · type S · no lines in 2026
16%84%1%
2.64
Michael Pigue
2W–3L career · no lines in 2026
18%82%<1%
2.63
Jonathan Young
32W–25L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Ryan Robinson
19W–20L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.