Teams

A8 Lakeside Park Engel/Stephens

2021 Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekend · Richmond Adult 18 & Over Women 3.5

12 players · average NTRP 4.25 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-06-05vs A1 Sal’s Berries SCC TornabeneWon 10
W#1 DoublesMissy Poccia / Crystal May vs Zoe Emerson / Carla Moore6-7, 6-2, 1-0
2021-05-22vs A6 TCRC WadeWon 10
W#1 SinglesCrystal May vs Virginia Grigg7-5, 6-1
2021-05-15vs A4 Burkwood FarmerWon 10
W#1 SinglesCrystal May vs Yen Huynh6-4, 6-1
2021-05-08vs A2 Woodlake PoindexterWon 10
W#2 SinglesCrystal May vs Kathleen Laroche6-0, 6-3
2021-04-17vs A3 Westwood Racelis Double TroubleLost 01
L#1 SinglesCrystal May vs Marta Honey2-6, 3-6
2021-04-10Won 10
W#2 SinglesCrystal May vs Valentina Robila6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesPam Koch / Crystal May vs Rina Dyer / Jennifer Scallon6-4, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 18 & Over Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.13 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.27
Allison Engel
published 4.5
3.73
Crystal May
usually #1 Singles 43%, also #2 Singles 29% · published 4
3.46
Rebecca Seidel
published
2.86
Pam Koch
published
2.81
Stacy Sherdel
published
2.79
Truitt Allcott
published
2.78
Linda Benson
published
2.75
Kim Earle
published
2.68
Tina Carter
published
Missy Poccia
published
Sherry Elliott
published
Toni Bolden-Ealey
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Allison Engel
2W–2L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%4%
4.27
4
Crystal May
243W–91L career · 7 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.73
Rebecca Seidel
10W–9L career · no lines in 2021
<1%62%38%
3.46
Pam Koch
2W–7L career · no lines in 2021
86%14%<1%
2.86
Stacy Sherdel
18W–43L career · no lines in 2021
1%91%8%
2.81
Truitt Allcott
3W–2L career · no lines in 2021
1%93%6%
2.79
Linda Benson
7W–13L career · no lines in 2021
95%5%<1%
2.78
Kim Earle
14W–11L career · no lines in 2021
3%95%3%
2.75
Tina Carter
15W–17L career · no lines in 2021
8%91%1%
2.68
Missy Poccia
1W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Sherry Elliott
0W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Toni Bolden-Ealey
1W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.