Teams

Hurley-Miller/BV/KTC

2024 Adult Singles 40 & Over · 3.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-12-15vs Dillard/Fayetteville/SRCLost 12
L#1 SinglesAnne Hurley vs Jamia Weir1-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesRebecca Bell vs Sherri Dillard6-0, 6-2
L#3 SinglesKaren Kavanaugh vs Brooke Redfern1-6, 2-6
2024-12-01vs Webb/Bentonville/PCCWon 21
L#1 SinglesRebecca Bell vs Suzanne Lankford1-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesMichelle van Schenck vs Kristin Webb6-3, 6-3
W#3 SinglesMeera Narayan vs Leann Akers6-2, 6-2
2024-11-17vs Nelson/Rogers/SVCCLost 03
L#1 SinglesMeera Narayan vs Anne Vargo4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 SinglesJodee Gore-Miller vs Nery Iselin2-6, 4-6
L#3 SinglesAnne Hurley vs Melanie Williams6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2024-11-16vs Dillard/Fayetteville/SRCLost 01
L#1 SinglesMichelle Goshert vs Jamia Weir2-6, 4-6
2024-11-07vs Briggs-Letts/Rogers/SVCCLost 12
L#1 SinglesMeera Narayan vs Nur Kamilah Chrenka5-7, 0-6
L#2 SinglesMichelle van Schenck vs Michelle Kehoe3-6, 1-6
W#3 SinglesMichelle Goshert vs Kara Briggs7-5, 6-4
2024-10-24vs Nelson/Rogers/SVCCLost 12
L#1 SinglesMichelle Goshert vs Cristina Rosas3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 SinglesKaren Kavanaugh vs Anne Vargo1-6, 4-6
W#3 SinglesRebecca Bell vs Melanie Williams6-2, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
Jodee Gore-Miller
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.29
Michelle van Schenck
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Catherine Young
published 3.5
3.17
Meera Narayan
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
3.10
Anne Hurley
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.00
Rebecca Bell
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
2.95
Karen Kavanaugh
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published
Michelle Goshert
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jodee Gore-Miller + Catherine Young134 matchesnot enough data
Michelle van Schenck + Michelle Goshert134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jodee Gore-Miller
25W–31L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%83%17%
3.38
Michelle van Schenck
27W–38L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%93%5%
3.29
3.5
Catherine Young
10W–7L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Meera Narayan
7W–19L career · 3 lines in 2024
10%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Anne Hurley
20W–33L career · 2 lines in 2024
23%77%<1%
3.10
Rebecca Bell
6W–14L career · 3 lines in 2024
50%50%<1%
3.00
Karen Kavanaugh
10W–15L career · 2 lines in 2024
66%34%<1%
2.95
Michelle Goshert
5W–7L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.