Teams

SD 3.5 Coronado TC/ Schmied (2:3)

2022 Adult 18 & Over Spring - SD · SD - Women - 3.5

9 players · average NTRP 3.12 / SAN DIEGO

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-05-31vs SD 3.5 SDTRC/ Monzon (3:2)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesChristy Ward / Caroline Mickel vs Irene Steinwinder / Kerry Ott1-6, 1-6
2022-05-24vs SD 3.5 Mountain View/ WunderlySplit 11
L#1 DoublesChristy Ward / Caroline Mickel vs Ryoko Adachi / Mina Tsuya1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesCarisa Hackworth / Lourdes Carrasco vs Cheryl Roche / TOMOKO BALKO7-5, 4-6, 1-0
2022-05-17vs SD 3.5 Mountain View/ WunderlyLost 01
L#1 DoublesChristy Ward / Caroline Mickel vs Junko Toda / Haruko Vajda2-6, 6-7
2022-05-10Lost 01
L#1 DoublesCaroline Mickel / Christy Ward vs Liza Tacher / Alexandra Safa2-6, 5-7
2022-05-03vs SD 3.5 Peninsula/ Trent (3:2)Won 10
W#3 DoublesCaroline Mickel / Doris Schmied vs Alicia Burnes / Shelly Patriquin6-2, 7-6
2022-04-26vs SD LLW 3.5 Mountain View/ PadillaLost 02
L#1 SinglesCarisa Hackworth vs Tenley Gritts1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesCaroline Mickel / Joan Fahrenthold vs Brenda Villasenor / DIANA ESCALANTE4-6, 2-6
W#1 DoublesCaroline Mickel / Christy Ward vs Ciara Levine / ALEXIS MCCANDLESS6-2, 6-2
2022-04-12vs SD 3.5 Moutain View/ Louis (3:2)Lost 02
L#2 DoublesCaroline Mickel / Doris Schmied vs Celina Tiznado / Elsa Dominguez3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 SinglesCarisa Hackworth vs Luisa Garcia de la Cabada6-0, 4-6, 0-1
2022-04-05vs SD 3.5 SDTRC/ Monzon (3:2)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesPatricia Padilla / Carisa Hackworth vs Sandy Dielman / Carrie Musicant2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesCaroline Mickel / Doris Schmied vs Sandra Angel / Irene Steinwinder3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SD - Women - 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.78 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.33
Caroline Mickel
usually #1 Doubles 42%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.25
Margaret Holland
published
2.96
Carisa Hackworth
usually #1 Doubles 25%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.76
Carla Guastoni
published 3
2.75
Veronica Marti
published
2.65
Marlis Vermehren
published
2.47
Lucinda Swain
published
2.46
Anne Rinko
published 3
2.42
Patricia Padilla
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carla Guastoni + Anne Rinko033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Caroline Mickel
65W–61L career · 12 lines in 2022
1%90%9%
3.33
Margaret Holland
15W–13L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
3
Carisa Hackworth
45W–50L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%61%39%
2.96
3
Carla Guastoni
2W–5L career · no lines in 2022
2%95%3%
2.76
Veronica Marti
3W–4L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
2.75
Marlis Vermehren
4W–6L career · no lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
2.65
Lucinda Swain
2W–2L career · no lines in 2022
60%40%<1%
2.47
3
Anne Rinko
0W–5L career · no lines in 2022
61%39%<1%
2.46
Patricia Padilla
3W–4L career · no lines in 2022
73%27%<1%
2.42

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.