Teams

KY/LOU/VOSS/POWERS

2025 USTA LEAGUE 40 & Over ADULT LOUISVILLE · 4.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 4.00 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-05-18vs KY/LOU/O'CONNELL(NPC)/BROWNFIELDLost 12
L#1 SinglesLaura Cunningham vs Regan Ackerman3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesJessica Hogan / Patricia Smith vs Leslie Bailey / Katie Schneider6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesKristin Shapira / Susan Witten vs Felicia Smith / Allison Blaney4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-03-16vs KY/LOU/BAUER/LAMPTONLost 04
L#1 DoublesCaroline Clark / Susan Witten vs Patricia Hooker / Jill Ricketts1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJessica Hogan / Laurie Moore vs Morgan Bauer / Shannon Lampton6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesHannah Barnes / Lindsey Burbridge vs Jessica Broughton / Katie Skeen2-6, 0-6
L#4 DoublesKristin Shapira / Jennifer Bray vs Lauren Whitsell / Mary Beth Zarobsky4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.96 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.65
Susan Florence
published
4.13
Susan Witten
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
4.00
Justina Powers
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.98
Mindy Terrell
published
3.95
Jessica Hogan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.91
Diana Britton
published 4
3.84
Laura Cunningham
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.74
Kristin Shapira
usually #4 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.70
Kelli Gordinier
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.66
Pilar Miron
published
Hannah Barnes
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Lindsey Burbridge
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Susan Florence
10W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%14%86%
4.65
Susan Witten
4W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
18%81%<1%
4.13
4
Justina Powers
86W–61L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%49%51%
4.00
Mindy Terrell
3W–12L career · no lines in 2025
56%44%<1%
3.98
Jessica Hogan
5W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
3.95
4
Diana Britton
18W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%73%26%
3.91
Laura Cunningham
21W–11L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.84
Kristin Shapira
14W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.74
4
Kelli Gordinier
66W–51L career · 5 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.70
Pilar Miron
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
13%86%1%
3.66
Hannah Barnes
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Lindsey Burbridge
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.