Teams

SAATL Kings

2025 Tri-Level League · Men 4.0, 3.5, 3.0

16 players · average NTRP 4.00 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2024-10-12vs Nett NutzWon 21
W#1 DoublesKrishnan Gopalan / Gopi Khandavali vs Paul Thepuatrakul / Carl Bain5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKavan Mehta / Milan Dattawade vs Rogelio Cirilo Jr / Poncho Tomita1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesNitin Sharma / Dinesh Wanvari vs Brian Chase / Ariel Canonizado6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.50 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.91
Gopi Khandavali
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.75
Pattabiraman Venkatesan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.73
Krishnan Gopalan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.68
3.63
3.61
3.57
Ganesh Shenoy
published
3.49
Shankar Chelakarai
published
3.47
3.39
Kiran Kumar Dagara
published
3.35
Snehal Patel
published
3.35
Dinesh Wanvari
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.20
Japan Shah
published
3.18
Kavan Mehta
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.16
Milan Dattawade
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Vamshi Kaluvala
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Pattabiraman Venkatesan + Muralikumar Gurunathan6944% games−4.4% vs expected
BHARATH BABU SUNKARA + Krishnan Gopalan5647% games−6.4% vs expected
Pattabiraman Venkatesan + Sumankumar Allimuthu3254% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Gopi Khandavali
14W–9L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%74%26%
3.91
Pattabiraman Venkatesan
11W–19L career · 2 lines in 2024
4%93%4%
3.75
Krishnan Gopalan
16W–21L career · 1 line in 2024
5%92%3%
3.73
Sumankumar Allimuthu
8W–11L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.68
4
BHARATH BABU SUNKARA
19W–16L career · no lines in 2024
18%82%<1%
3.63
Muralikumar Gurunathan
8W–11L career · no lines in 2024
22%78%<1%
3.61
Ganesh Shenoy
15W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%31%69%
3.57
Shankar Chelakarai
16W–9L career · no lines in 2024
<1%53%47%
3.49
4
Chandrashekar Vemula
1W–3L career · no lines in 2024
58%42%<1%
3.47
Kiran Kumar Dagara
2W–4L career · no lines in 2024
78%22%<1%
3.39
Snehal Patel
15W–5L career · no lines in 2024
1%85%15%
3.35
Dinesh Wanvari
5W–9L career · 1 line in 2024
1%85%14%
3.35
Japan Shah
1W–4L career · no lines in 2024
8%91%2%
3.20
Kavan Mehta
10W–15L career · 1 line in 2024
10%89%1%
3.18
Milan Dattawade
6W–20L career · 1 line in 2024
12%87%1%
3.16
Vamshi Kaluvala
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.