Teams

BC-ErnieHowlett/NormaIskenderian

2023 Mixed 40 & Over · BC - Mixed 40 & Over - 7.0

19 players · average NTRP 3.25 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2023-08-27vs BC-Kramer/ChristopherBallSplit 11
W#1 DoublesRichard Butlig / Jennifer Lee Loy vs Jennifer Giordano / Tom Plotts6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesPolly McCray / Timothy Bryant vs Tracey Cloud / David Cobb2-6, 5-7
2023-08-27vs BC-ElDorado/JohnTuppalLost 01
L#1 DoublesRichard Butlig / Jennifer Lee Loy vs MALU NORTON / Danny Le2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2023-08-26vs BC-MCC/MelissaReadyLost 01
L#1 DoublesPolly McCray / Timothy Bryant vs Joi Gillam / Barry Ryan4-6, 6-7
2023-08-06vs BC-MCC/LevineSplit 11
L#1 DoublesSAL DEGUZMAN / Sharon Alston vs Heath Gregory / Amanda Gregory1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesTimothy Bryant / Jennifer Lee Loy vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-07-30vs BC-LLW-WestEnd/BarrySt.JohnWon 10
W#3 DoublesKaren Barry / Timothy Bryant vs Michele Ocampo / Jose Ocampo6-3, 6-1
2023-07-23vs BC-WestEnd/DebiRaaschWon 20
W#1 DoublesTimothy Bryant / Polly McCray vs Keith French / Xiomara Comrie6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRichard Butlig / Celeste Torres vs Tom Rodzewich / Kay Cotter6-0, 6-2
2023-07-22vs BC-MCC/LevineLost 01
L#1 DoublesEvangeline Roxas-Butlig / Timothy Bryant vs Audra Steller / Eric Steller5-7, 2-6
2023-06-11vs BC-LLW-WestEnd/BarrySt.JohnWon 10
W#2 DoublesTimothy Bryant / Jady Vonderlieth vs Kimberly Jones / Karl Ziegler6-3, 6-7, 1-0
2023-06-03vs BC-WestEnd/DebiRaaschLost 01
L#1 DoublesTimothy Bryant / Evangeline Roxas-Butlig vs Brent Abrenica / Jane Song-Gee1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for BC - Mixed 40 & Over - 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Richard Butlig
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.52
Celeste Torres
published 3.5
3.47
SAL DEGUZMAN
published 3.5
3.37
Kate Kim
published
John Henderson
published 3.5
3.25
Jennifer Lee Loy
published
3.23
Milagros Holub
published
3.13
Karen Barry
published
3.11
Rex Claridge
published
3.09
Polly McCray
published
3.02
Susana Jalali
published
2.82
Jady Vonderlieth
published 3
2.78
Dale Hughes
published 3
Dolly Pham
published 3
Jake Kim
published 3
2.73
Sharon Alston
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Mina Jorgensen
published
Timothy Bryant
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Evangeline Roxas-Butlig + Richard Butlig10365% games+8.9% vs expected
Sharon Alston + SAL DEGUZMAN224 matchesnot enough data
Kate Kim + Jake Kim303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Richard Butlig
101W–49L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%87%12%
3.85
3.5
Celeste Torres
46W–18L career · no lines in 2023
<1%43%57%
3.52
3.5
SAL DEGUZMAN
17W–20L career · no lines in 2023
<1%59%41%
3.47
Kate Kim
6W–2L career · no lines in 2023
<1%83%17%
3.37
3.5
John Henderson
no matches on record · type M · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Jennifer Lee Loy
8W–6L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%3%
3.25
Milagros Holub
2W–5L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.23
Karen Barry
2W–3L career · no lines in 2023
16%83%<1%
3.13
Rex Claridge
8W–9L career · no lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
3.11
Polly McCray
8W–9L career · no lines in 2023
24%76%<1%
3.09
3
Evangeline Roxas-Butlig
49W–30L career · no lines in 2023
<1%34%66%
3.05
Susana Jalali
2W–5L career · no lines in 2023
42%58%<1%
3.02
3
Jady Vonderlieth
7W–6L career · no lines in 2023
1%91%9%
2.82
3
Dale Hughes
8W–8L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
2.78
3
Dolly Pham
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Jake Kim
3W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Sharon Alston
48W–58L career · 1 line in 2023
4%94%2%
2.73
Mina Jorgensen
7W–7L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Timothy Bryant
27W–44L career · 8 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.