Teams

Lewis

2024 Frederick Adult 40 & Over · Frederick Adult 40 & Over 4.0 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.90 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-04-24vs BieseckerLost 01
L#1 DoublesMelissa Truffer / Evelien Josselin vs Elona Novitski / Mekkla Thompson2-6, 4-6
2024-04-14vs BieseckerLost 01
L#2 DoublesEvelien Josselin / Sabrina Alban vs Elona Novitski / Mekkla Thompson4-6, 1-6
2024-04-02vs BieseckerSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJoy Oliver / Evelien Josselin vs Cecelia Biesecker / Stephanie Porta3-6, 6-0, 1-0
L#2 DoublesChristina Truax / Aline Rodriguez vs Jana Conigliaro / Elona Novitski1-6, 6-6
2024-03-27vs BieseckerWon 10
W#2 DoublesEvelien Josselin / Joy Oliver vs Cecelia Biesecker / Cecilia Jones6-3, 6-4
2024-03-20vs BieseckerWon 10
W#2 DoublesAline Rodriguez / Angela Castilho vs Mary Jo Roberton / Cecilia Jones6-7, 4-3, 1-0
2024-03-16Won 10
W#2 DoublesMelissa Truffer / Evelien Josselin vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-03-13vs BieseckerLost 01
L#1 SinglesAline Rodriguez vs Ashley Pietryka0-6, 0-6
2024-03-10vs BieseckerLost 01
L#2 DoublesEvelien Josselin / Melissa Truffer vs Cecelia Biesecker / Mary Shawhan5-7, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Frederick Adult 40 & Over 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.59 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.13
Evelien Josselin
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.82
Joy Oliver
published
3.78
Jaime Lewis
published
3.75
Aline Rodriguez
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
3.71
Lisa Roy
published
3.63
3.53
Sabrina Alban
published
3.53
Christina Truax
published 4
3.28
Cora Ho
published 3.5
3.25
Melissa Truffer
published
3.06
Giselle Medina
published
Millette Miller
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Evelien Josselin
202W–69L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%17%83%
4.13
Joy Oliver
15W–10L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%9%
3.82
Jaime Lewis
7W–10L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.78
4
Aline Rodriguez
111W–95L career · 3 lines in 2024
4%93%4%
3.75
Lisa Roy
35W–15L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.71
4
Christine Pagendarm
8W–8L career · no lines in 2024
17%82%<1%
3.63
Sabrina Alban
17W–13L career · no lines in 2024
<1%41%59%
3.53
4
Christina Truax
3W–8L career · no lines in 2024
42%58%<1%
3.53
3.5
Cora Ho
120W–87L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.28
Melissa Truffer
0W–3L career · no lines in 2024
96%4%<1%
3.25
Giselle Medina
28W–27L career · no lines in 2024
34%66%<1%
3.06
Millette Miller
7W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.