Teams

Cochran 18s 4.5M Mon PM

2025 Piedmont USTA 18 & Over · MEN 4.5 18 & Over Mon PM

11 players · average NTRP 4.20 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-05-12vs Burns 18s 4.5M Mon PMLost 03
L#1 DoublesMark Teears / Conner McGowan vs Michael Davis / Eric Anthony3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesHoward Driggers / Aaron Strasser vs Chuck Burns / Brooks Jackson4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMatthew Cochran / J Stacey Allred vs Kenny Winter / Perry Smith2-6, 0-6
2025-04-21vs Burns 18s 4.5M Mon PMLost 03
L#1 DoublesAaron Strasser / Tyler Paul vs Alex Rucker / Chris Hill0-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#1 SinglesConner McGowan vs Tommy Houston0-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesEric Nocera / Mark Teears vs Lee Picklesimer / Chuck Burns3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-04-09vs Fleihan 18s 4.5M Mon PMLost 05
L#1 DoublesConner McGowan / John Kim vs Matt Hughes / Steven Denning3-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesTyler Paul vs Brian Cohen2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMark Teears / Philip Cooke vs Ziad Fleihan / Philip Kuntz1-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesMatthew Cochran vs Chris Chapman1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesEric Nocera / J Stacey Allred vs Jack Oldis / Michael Shade1-6, 2-6
2025-03-31vs Burns 18s 4.5M Mon PMLost 13
L#1 DoublesHoward Driggers / Aaron Strasser vs Michael Davis / Alex Rucker2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesWilson Paine vs Tommy Houston4-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesJ Stacey Allred / Mark Teears vs Kenny Winter / Caleb Dawson1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesEric Nocera / Tyler Paul vs Chris Hill / Eric Anthony5-7, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 4.5 18 & Over Mon PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.79 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.02
Wilson Paine
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
4.01
Aaron Strasser
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.99
Conner McGowan
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4.5
3.95
Mark Teears
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.81
Tyler Paul
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
3.75
Eric Nocera
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.59
Howard Driggers
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.55
J Stacey Allred
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.46
Matthew Cochran
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Philip Cooke
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Samraat Saxena
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Aaron Strasser + Howard Driggers1639% gamesnot enough data
Howard Driggers + J Stacey Allred123 matchesnot enough data
Tyler Paul + Conner McGowan123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Wilson Paine
7W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
44%56%<1%
4.02
4.5
Aaron Strasser
2W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
47%53%<1%
4.01
4.5
Conner McGowan
8W–20L career · 3 lines in 2025
54%46%<1%
3.99
Mark Teears
14W–16L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%65%35%
3.95
Tyler Paul
8W–13L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%91%8%
3.81
4
Eric Nocera
19W–24L career · 4 lines in 2025
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Howard Driggers
8W–19L career · 2 lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.59
4
J Stacey Allred
12W–35L career · 4 lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
3.55
Matthew Cochran
13W–41L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
3.46
Philip Cooke
4W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Samraat Saxena
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.