Teams

Always Causing a Racquet

2022 SVTA Singles Fall Women · Shenandoah 2.5 Weekend FALL Singles Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2022-10-30vs Rally CatsWon 10
W#2 SinglesSue Nilsson vs Christina White6-0, 6-1
2022-10-01Won 10
W#1 SinglesSue Nilsson vs Jane Kim6-2, 6-3
2022-09-24vs All About that AceWon 10
W#3 SinglesSue Nilsson vs Jian Wen6-3, 6-1
2022-09-17vs Rally CatsWon 10
W#3 SinglesJudy Rector vs Desiree Wing6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Shenandoah 2.5 Weekend FALL Singles Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.85 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.63
Samantha Chapman
published
2.92
Deborah Williams
published 3
2.85
Fiona Campbell
published 3
2.81
Sue Nilsson
usually #4 Singles 40%, also #3 Singles 20% · published 3
2.79
Judy Rector
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3
2.76
Nancy Gatti
published
2.73
Susan Campbell
published
2.30
Susan Dudley
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Deborah Williams + Judy Rector4648% games+3.4% vs expected
Deborah Williams + Susan Campbell5745% games−3.0% vs expected
Sue Nilsson + Judy Rector21140% games−7.6% vs expected
Judy Rector + Susan Campbell224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Samantha Chapman
20W–15L career · no lines in 2022
15%85%<1%
3.63
3
Deborah Williams
29W–35L career · no lines in 2022
<1%73%27%
2.92
3
Fiona Campbell
3W–2L career · no lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
2.85
3
Sue Nilsson
85W–147L career · 5 lines in 2022
1%92%7%
2.81
3
Judy Rector
73W–88L career · 1 line in 2022
1%93%6%
2.79
Nancy Gatti
4W–5L career · no lines in 2022
2%95%3%
2.76
Susan Campbell
17W–20L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
2.73
Susan Dudley
2W–4L career · no lines in 2022
0%94%6%
2.30

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.