Teams

Burke 3.5 40 Tues

2023 Piedmont USTA 40 & Over · WOMEN 3.5 40 & Over

14 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 40 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.06 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.31
Martha Cox
published
Becky Kincaid
published 3.5
3.19
Susan Calkins
published
3.18
Jan Whittaker
published
3.15
Jaime Hendricks
published
3.14
Leslie Crooker
published
3.12
Vickie Degges
published
3.10
Gina Kinard
published
3.00
Susan Sinclair
published
2.93
Darci Gold
published 3.5
2.92
Wanda Davis
published
2.84
Beverly Burke
published 3
2.83
Brenda MacFadden
published 3
Jennie Pekarne
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jaime Hendricks + Gina Kinard033 matchesnot enough data
Susan Calkins + Becky Kincaid213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Martha Cox
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
92%8%<1%
3.31
3.5
Becky Kincaid
3W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Susan Calkins
6W–6L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.19
Jan Whittaker
10W–13L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.18
Jaime Hendricks
12W–23L career · no lines in 2023
15%85%1%
3.15
Leslie Crooker
5W–7L career · no lines in 2023
16%83%<1%
3.14
Vickie Degges
14W–22L career · no lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
3.12
Gina Kinard
6W–20L career · no lines in 2023
25%75%<1%
3.10
Susan Sinclair
1W–6L career · no lines in 2023
49%51%<1%
3.00
3.5
Darci Gold
1W–6L career · no lines in 2023
69%31%<1%
2.93
Wanda Davis
2W–18L career · no lines in 2023
71%29%<1%
2.92
3
Beverly Burke
0W–5L career · no lines in 2023
1%86%13%
2.84
3
Brenda MacFadden
8W–16L career · no lines in 2023
1%88%11%
2.83
Jennie Pekarne
6W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.