Teams

MILL VALLEY CM8.5A

2024 COMBO · Men 8.5

29 players · average NTRP 4.25 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Men 8.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.89 estimated across 22 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.41
Matt Dunn
published
4.28
Paul Stiff
published
Andrew Mercy
published 4.5
Courtenay MacOmber
published 4.5
Eric Issadore
published 4.5
4.23
Jim Humes
published
4.19
Mike Natenshon
published
4.13
James Milligan
published 4.5
4.07
Andrew MacKay
published 4.5
4.06
Frank Young
published 4.5
3.97
Jonathan Rutchik
published
3.97
Brian Kneafsey
published 4.5
3.93
Kevin Knowles
published
3.84
Benjamin Moglen
published 4
3.82
Roark Vandien
published
3.80
Bill Graham
published 4
3.74
Charley Hoefer
published 4
3.69
Nick Bockh
published
3.68
Chris Oconnor
published 4
3.67
Markus Kraemling
published
3.67
Israel Rosales
published 4
3.65
Aaron Klink
published 4
3.65
Joe Boswell
published
3.63
Mark Shaw
published
3.50
Brian Weisman
published 4
John Yearout
published
Lane Shackleton
published
Lucas Hatch
published
Michael Ellis
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Matt Dunn
5W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%76%24%
4.41
Paul Stiff
6W–4L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%5%
4.28
4.5
Andrew Mercy
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4.5
Courtenay MacOmber
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4.5
Eric Issadore
1W–2L career · type S · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Jim Humes
1W–3L career · no lines in 2024
4%94%2%
4.23
Mike Natenshon
2W–5L career · no lines in 2024
7%92%1%
4.19
4.5
James Milligan
1W–3L career · no lines in 2024
15%85%<1%
4.13
4.5
Andrew MacKay
2W–5L career · no lines in 2024
30%70%<1%
4.07
4.5
Frank Young
2W–5L career · no lines in 2024
32%68%<1%
4.06
Jonathan Rutchik
2W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%59%41%
3.97
4.5
Brian Kneafsey
5W–3L career · no lines in 2024
60%40%<1%
3.97
Kevin Knowles
7W–2L career · no lines in 2024
<1%70%30%
3.93
4
Benjamin Moglen
4W–2L career · no lines in 2024
<1%89%11%
3.84
Roark Vandien
7W–3L career · no lines in 2024
1%91%8%
3.82
4
Bill Graham
12W–7L career · no lines in 2024
1%92%7%
3.80
4
Charley Hoefer
1W–3L career · no lines in 2024
3%95%2%
3.74
Nick Bockh
3W–6L career · no lines in 2024
7%92%1%
3.69
4
Chris Oconnor
3W–6L career · no lines in 2024
8%91%1%
3.68
Markus Kraemling
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.67
4
Israel Rosales
11W–7L career · no lines in 2024
10%90%1%
3.67
4
Aaron Klink
5W–5L career · no lines in 2024
12%88%<1%
3.65
Joe Boswell
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
12%87%<1%
3.65
Mark Shaw
9W–5L career · no lines in 2024
16%83%<1%
3.63
4
Brian Weisman
0W–5L career · no lines in 2024
50%50%<1%
3.50
John Yearout
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Lane Shackleton
2W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Lucas Hatch
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Michael Ellis
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.