Teams

21 Willow Oaks Franks

2023 Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekend · Richmond Adult 18 & Over 3.0 Men

16 players · average NTRP 3.20 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 18 & Over 3.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.02 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.61
Chris Price
published 3.5
3.33
Danny MacNelly
published 3.5
3.33
Michael Chapman
published
3.19
Ryan Frei
published
3.02
Trent McFadden
published
2.97
Ivan Mullinax
published
2.97
Bill Dagostino
published 3
2.94
Troy Kingsbury
published
2.84
Hank Heyming
published
2.81
Jim Kennedy
published
2.81
Charles Ayers
published 3
2.75
Raymond Cargill
published
2.64
Eric Haley
published
Robert Brichta
published
Tyler Franks
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ivan Mullinax + Danny MacNelly303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Chris Price
32W–4L career · no lines in 2023
<1%22%78%
3.61
3.5
Danny MacNelly
12W–11L career · no lines in 2023
1%88%11%
3.33
Michael Chapman
12W–3L career · no lines in 2023
1%88%11%
3.33
Ryan Frei
20W–20L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.19
Trent McFadden
26W–11L career · no lines in 2023
<1%44%56%
3.02
Ivan Mullinax
32W–30L career · no lines in 2023
<1%58%42%
2.97
3
Bill Dagostino
10W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%59%41%
2.97
Troy Kingsbury
12W–10L career · no lines in 2023
<1%67%33%
2.94
Hank Heyming
7W–7L career · no lines in 2023
1%86%13%
2.84
Jim Kennedy
14W–14L career · no lines in 2023
1%89%9%
2.81
3
Charles Ayers
7W–5L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%9%
2.81
Raymond Cargill
12W–12L career · no lines in 2023
3%93%4%
2.75
3
Bradley Ridlehoover
1W–4L career · type S · no lines in 2023
15%84%1%
2.64
Eric Haley
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Robert Brichta
3W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Tyler Franks
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.