Teams

KY/PUR/GARNER

2025 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER PURCHASE · 3.5 Men

8 players · average NTRP 3.17 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-05-27vs KY/PUR/HANELINELost 02
L#1 DoublesDonald Hollowell / Anthony Garner vs Bryan Bodine / Thomas Lambert3-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesAdres Middleton vs Isaiah Butler1-6, 3-6
2025-05-23vs KY/PUR/HANELINELost 03
L#1 DoublesMatthew Johnston / Anthony Garner vs Whitson McNeill / Thomas Lambert3-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesAdres Middleton vs Devin Haneline1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBen Mathis / Seth Bucy vs Isaiah Butler / Joshua Morris2-6, 0-6
2025-05-22vs KY/PUR/HANELINELost 03
L#1 DoublesDavid East / JASON Acree vs Patrick Lally / William Hatchett0-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesBen Mathis vs Joshua Morris1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDonald Hollowell / Adres Middleton vs Devin Haneline / Thomas Lambert2-6, 1-6
2025-05-06vs KY/PUR/HANELINELost 03
L#1 DoublesJay Atwill / David East vs Trevor Sanders / Josiah Wall2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesAnthony Garner vs Devin Haneline1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesSeth Bucy / Ben Mathis vs William Hatchett / Joshua Morris2-6, 1-6
2025-04-15vs KY/PUR/HANELINELost 03
L#1 DoublesPatrick Wallace / Seth Bucy vs Devin Haneline / William Hatchett3-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesMatthew Johnston vs Patrick Lally3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesBen Mathis / Donald Hollowell vs Isaiah Butler / Bryan Bodine1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.01 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.21
Anthony Garner
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
3.17
Matthew Johnston
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.11
Adres Middleton
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
3.06
Ben Mathis
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3.5
2.88
Donald Hollowell
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.63
JASON Acree
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Jay Atwill
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Seth Bucy
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Anthony Garner
13W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%7%93%
3.21
Matthew Johnston
4W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%11%89%
3.17
3
Adres Middleton
3W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%21%79%
3.11
3.5
Ben Mathis
2W–7L career · 4 lines in 2025
32%68%<1%
3.06
Donald Hollowell
8W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
2.88
JASON Acree
0W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
17%82%<1%
2.63
Jay Atwill
0W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Seth Bucy
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.