Teams

LSelland/SAsby (Sardis)

2025 Combo Doubles 55 & Over League · 55 & Over 7.5 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.71 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-10-14vs SPierle (Weddington)Split 11
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Johnston / Lynn Selland vs Michele Ovendorf / Danna Jean Pompeo7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDeborah Russo / Patricia Phelan vs Cheri King / Kelley Montroy2-6, 2-6
2025-10-07vs PDonoghue (Matthews)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesMichelle Goins / Deborah Russo vs Nancy Miller / Carol Childress6-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesLydia Schoeck / Sarah Asby vs Kimberly Burkhamer / Sharon Wooten6-2, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesRenee Broud / Patricia Phelan vs Paula Donoghue / Donna Musante3-6, 4-6
2025-09-23vs SPierle (Weddington)Lost 12
W#1 DoublesLynn Selland / Elizabeth Johnston vs Cheri King / Nancy Klug6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSarah Asby / Renee Broud vs Barb Marthinsen / Suzy Sandbo1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesSharon Storck / Colleen Priest vs Karen Foster / Sara Applegate3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-09-16vs PDonoghue (Matthews)Lost 12
W#1 DoublesSharon Storck / Renee Broud vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesLynn Selland / Lydia Schoeck vs Kimberly Burkhamer / Ofelia Claxton4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesTracy Graham / Colleen Priest vs Paula Donoghue / Carol Childress4-6, 2-6
2025-09-02vs SPierle (Weddington)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesSarah Asby / Sheryl Beaver vs Cheri King / Tamara Gallagher3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJoni Smith / Tracy Graham vs Barb Marthinsen / Nancy Klug1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesElizabeth Johnston / Michelle Goins vs Sara Applegate / Cyndie Hobson4-6, 7-6, 0-1
2025-08-26vs PDonoghue (Matthews)Won 21
L#1 DoublesLynn Selland / Colleen Priest vs Leila Tissue / Donna Musante4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesSarah Asby / Lydia Schoeck vs Dawn Castain / Sharon Wooten4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSheryl Beaver / Sharon Storck vs Paula Donoghue / Sally Probst6-0, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings13 teams · 55 & Over 7.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LChriscoe/PGolding (Southampton)7221618183
2ASykes (OPRC)7219822221
3JGieker (Lifetime)7218924220
4RDrees/RO'Rourke (Blakeney)6318924235
5SPierle (Weddington)5114416149
6MGlover (OPRC)54171027246
7JCarnahan (Palisades)45121536266
8YGama/Davidson (WSRC)45111638263
9PDonoghue (Matthews)2471124177
10LSelland/SAsby (Sardis)2461228181
11JLocke/MMcKinstry (Raintree)2781940272
12KFisher (PPRSC)2772044288
13MShuford/CJensen (OPRC)1842347301

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.42 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.68
Elizabeth Johnston
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.63
Sheryl Beaver
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.62
Lydia Schoeck
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.61
Renee Broud
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.54
Janine Rust
published
3.49
Deborah Russo
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.46
Colleen Priest
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.39
Sarah Asby
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.33
Tracy Graham
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.29
Lynn Selland
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.28
Sharon Storck
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.06
Michelle Goins
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.04
Patricia Phelan
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sheryl Beaver + Sarah Asby3252% games−2.4% vs expected
Lynn Selland + Sarah Asby4251% games−4.8% vs expected
Sharon Storck + Sarah Asby5650% gamesnot enough data
Colleen Priest + Renee Broud3551% gamesnot enough data
Sharon Storck + Tracy Graham5069% gamesnot enough data
Tracy Graham + Sarah Asby033 matchesnot enough data
Elizabeth Johnston + Sheryl Beaver213 matchesnot enough data
Lydia Schoeck + Sarah Asby213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Elizabeth Johnston
12W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
8%91%1%
3.68
4
Sheryl Beaver
35W–41L career · 2 lines in 2025
16%84%<1%
3.63
3.5
Lydia Schoeck
103W–69L career · type A · 3 lines in 2025
<1%17%83%
3.62
Renee Broud
51W–61L career · 3 lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.61
Janine Rust
5W–13L career · no lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
3.54
4
Deborah Russo
8W–18L career · 2 lines in 2025
53%47%<1%
3.49
3.5
Colleen Priest
18W–23L career · type A · 3 lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
3.46
3.5
Sarah Asby
91W–72L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.39
Tracy Graham
24W–18L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%90%10%
3.33
Lynn Selland
18W–18L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%94%5%
3.29
3.5
Sharon Storck
97W–93L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%94%5%
3.28
Michelle Goins
5W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
3.06
Patricia Phelan
17W–21L career · 2 lines in 2025
38%62%<1%
3.04

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.