Teams

Pelton/Wilson DAY

2024 SOUTH EAST TENNIS ADULT 40 & OVER · WOMEN 3.5

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-05-09vs Kosh Spring 2024Won 10
W#2 DoublesSherri Souza / Melissa Martin vs Rebecca Lothe / Christine Bean7-6, 6-7, 1-0
2024-04-28vs deOlivaLost 01
L#1 DoublesMelissa Martin / Maria Weese vs Pati DeOliva / Evelyn Foster2-6, 6-7
2024-04-23vs BringardLost 01
L#1 DoublesKatie Monroe / Melissa Martin vs Mary Simmons / Jennifer Wescott5-7, 6-4, 0-1
2024-04-16vs Epperly PNCCWon 10
W#2 DoublesMelissa Martin / Sherri Souza vs Tara Duckworth / Tracy Mills6-4, 6-4
2024-03-26vs BrancoWon 10
W#2 DoublesMelissa Martin / Maria Weese vs Alicia Boaz / Laurie Eskew6-1, 6-3
2024-03-21vs Martin/EshelmanWon 10
W#2 DoublesMelissa Martin / Katie Monroe vs Hope Sloan / April Eshelman6-2, 6-2
2024-03-17vs Morgan 3.5, 40+, 2024Lost 01
L#1 DoublesPatricia Pelton / Melissa Martin vs Debbie Freeman / Laura Rackley6-4, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.39
Lois Randall
published
3.35
Melissa Martin
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.32
Katie Monroe
published
3.19
Karen Wall
published
3.19
Maria Weese
published
3.19
Patricia Pelton
published
3.17
Tayna Jones
published
2.97
Kathleen Murphy
published
Joan Proctor
published
Sabrina Nikel
published
Sherri Souza
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Karen Wall + Katie Monroe314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lois Randall
6W–13L career · no lines in 2024
<1%78%22%
3.39
3.5
Melissa Martin
58W–52L career · 7 lines in 2024
1%85%15%
3.35
Katie Monroe
12W–7L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%10%
3.32
Karen Wall
11W–13L career · no lines in 2024
8%90%1%
3.19
Maria Weese
6W–7L career · no lines in 2024
8%90%1%
3.19
Patricia Pelton
15W–13L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.19
Tayna Jones
32W–40L career · no lines in 2024
11%88%1%
3.17
Kathleen Murphy
14W–22L career · no lines in 2024
58%42%<1%
2.97
Joan Proctor
14W–7L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Sabrina Nikel
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Sherri Souza
1W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.