Teams

VStiebris-HS

2026 Eno River Mixed 55 & Over · 55 & Over Mixed 3.5

14 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-07-30vs NDraughon-YMCALost 12
L#1 DoublesDonna Spero / Ralph Russo vs Nancy Draughon / Philip Sweigart6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLaura Webb-Murrah / Charles Bishop vs Mary Parker / James White6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDavid Stefan / Kathy Reedy vs Susana Harvey / Glenn Matsushima2-6, 1-6
2026-07-23vs NDraughon-YMCALost 12
L#1 DoublesValdis Stiebris / Millicent Snow vs Derek Saccoccio / Maya Ress2-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesStephen Rothchild / Jennifer Hoffmann vs Glenn Matsushima / Donna Newell6-2, 7-6
L#3 DoublesScott Hartman / Laura Webb-Murrah vs Ed Holub / Deb Lanier4-6, 3-6
2026-07-16vs ABaxley-DURWon 30
W#1 DoublesMillicent Snow / Charles Bishop vs Lisa Kempf / Greg Kempf6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSally Mauriello / Mark Macdonald vs Tracy Lowrance / Chris Sansone6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesJennifer Hoffmann / Valdis Stiebris vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-07-12vs MLong.55.3.5-DURWon 20
W#1 DoublesStephen Rothchild / Jennifer Hoffmann vs Scott Jolly / Celina Morice6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKathy Reedy / Charles Bishop vs Mary T Long / Robert Long6-0, 6-2
2026-07-09vs ABaxley-DURWon 30
W#1 DoublesKathy Reedy / Rick Kerns vs Greg Kempf / Lisa Kempf6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesDonna Spero / Scott Hartman vs Steve Clark / Angela Baxley6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesAnna Fadel / Mark Macdonald vs Rita Burgess / Stephen Duvall7-5, 6-3
2026-06-23vs GGlish-CHTCLost 12
W#1 DoublesRick Kerns / Anna Fadel vs Amy Strong / David VanHook6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesDonna Spero / Scott Hartman vs Beth Spinarski / Adam Strom2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesLaura Webb-Murrah / Valdis Stiebris vs Lynne Farber / Doug Kopec2-6, 0-6
2026-06-18vs GGlish-CHTCLost 03
L#1 DoublesStephen Rothchild / Sally Mauriello vs Sara Summers / Randy Cubrilovic2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMark Macdonald / Millicent Snow vs Melissa Fitzpatrick / Gary Glish5-7, 6-1, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDavid Stefan / Anna Fadel vs Joelle Permutt / Timothy Buckley2-6, 7-5, 0-1
2026-06-05vs MLong.55.3.5-DURWon 30
W#1 DoublesAnna Fadel / Rick Kerns vs Araya Coffey / Bill Stewart6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesCharles Bishop / Millicent Snow vs Pete Gryson / Celina Morice6-2, 2-1
W#3 DoublesLaura Webb-Murrah / Mark Macdonald vs Scott Jolly / Mary T Long6-1, 0-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 55 & Over Mixed 3.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NDraughon-YMCA7119513155
2GGlish-CHTC7118616171
3VStiebris-HS4415921175
4ABaxley-DUR2671734223
5MLong.55.3.5-DUR0812347288

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.52
Rick Kerns
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.39
Kathy Reedy
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.32
Millicent Snow
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.30
Donna Spero
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.28
Anna Fadel
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.27
Stephen Rothchild
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.18
Laura Webb-Murrah
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.18
Sally Mauriello
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.15
Ralph Russo
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.14
Mark Macdonald
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.13
David Stefan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.11
Scott Hartman
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.08
Valdis Stiebris
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Charles Bishop
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Millicent Snow + Stephen Rothchild3250% gamesnot enough data
Valdis Stiebris + Sally Mauriello224 matchesnot enough data
Valdis Stiebris + Laura Webb-Murrah033 matchesnot enough data
Valdis Stiebris + Millicent Snow123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rick Kerns
15W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%45%55%
3.52
Kathy Reedy
20W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%78%21%
3.39
3.5
Millicent Snow
67W–57L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.32
Donna Spero
20W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.30
3.5
Anna Fadel
12W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%92%5%
3.28
3.5
Stephen Rothchild
62W–60L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Laura Webb-Murrah
110W–118L career · 4 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Sally Mauriello
144W–151L career · 2 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.18
Ralph Russo
5W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
14%85%1%
3.15
Mark Macdonald
6W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
16%84%1%
3.14
3.5
David Stefan
1W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
18%82%<1%
3.13
Scott Hartman
3W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
3.11
3.5
Valdis Stiebris
57W–72L career · 3 lines in 2026
28%71%<1%
3.08
Charles Bishop
5W–1L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.