Teams

Ray 18s 4.0W Singles Thurs PM

2026 Piedmont Singles 18+ · 4.0 Women Singles

7 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
W#1 SinglesKelly Gekas vs Layne Saunders6-2, 7-6
W#2 SinglesKristin Williamson vs Ann Martel7-5, 6-0
L#3 SinglesCarol Schuck Dillon vs Elizabeth Jones0-6, 4-6
2026-07-17vs Harlan 18s 4.0W Singles Thurs PMWon 20
W#1 SinglesKelly Gekas vs Melissa Beeson6-2, 6-1
W#2 SinglesKristin Williamson vs Kim Hunt6-2, 6-3
2026-07-16Lost 12
L#1 SinglesKelly Gekas vs Ashley Jones6-7, 1-6
W#2 SinglesMadison Bowen vs Jordan Johnson6-3, 6-2
L#3 SinglesCarrie McElvogue vs Elizabeth Jones2-6, 1-6
2026-07-09vs Harlan 18s 4.0W Singles Thurs PMSplit 11
L#1 SinglesCarrie McElvogue vs Christina Campbell1-6, 3-6
W#3 SinglesKara Ray vs Melissa Beeson5-5
2026-06-25vs Harlan 18s 4.0W Singles Thurs PMLost 03
L#1 SinglesMadison Bowen vs Christina Campbell4-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesMelissa Goodman vs Holly Hinshelwood2-6, 3-6
L#3 SinglesKristin Williamson vs Leigh Abraham1-6, 6-7
W#1 SinglesMadison Bowen vs Ashley Jones6-4, 6-0
L#2 SinglesKara Ray vs Kate Brittain1-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesCarrie McElvogue vs Amy Gilbert6-7, 6-3, 0-1
W#1 SinglesKelly Gekas vs Ann Martel6-3, 6-0
L#2 SinglesCarol Schuck Dillon vs Kate Brittain6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 SinglesMelissa Goodman vs Elizabeth Jones3-6, 4-6
2026-05-30vs Harlan 18s 4.0W Singles Thurs PMSplit 11
W#1 SinglesCarol Schuck Dillon vs Tracy Harlan6-1, 6-3
L#2 SinglesKara Ray vs Julie Dover3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women Singles have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.66 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.91
Kristin Williamson
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
3.78
Kelly Gekas
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.72
Kara Ray
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
3.63
Carol Schuck Dillon
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4
3.60
Madison Bowen
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
3.57
Melissa Goodman
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
3.44
Carrie McElvogue
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kristin Williamson + Madison Bowen16365% games+14.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kristin Williamson
40W–35L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%73%27%
3.91
Kelly Gekas
30W–13L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.78
Kara Ray
17W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.72
4
Carol Schuck Dillon
11W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
19%81%<1%
3.63
Madison Bowen
30W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
3.60
Melissa Goodman
41W–21L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%31%69%
3.57
4
Carrie McElvogue
4W–23L career · 3 lines in 2026
68%32%<1%
3.44

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.