Teams

SGV LLW Racket Science Ladies - Saucedo - SDS

2021 Tri-Level League - San Gabriel Valley · SGV - Women 3.0

6 players · average NTRP 4.17 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2021-09-18Won 20
W#1 DoublesNicole Reyes / Christie Boniface vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesVeronica Saucedo / Miki Makiko Shimizu vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#1 DoublesNicole Reyes / Christie Boniface vs Trish Newlin / Laura Stover7-5, 6-3
2021-09-04Lost 01
L#1 DoublesNicole Reyes / Christie Boniface vs Theona Zhordania / Julia Campbell3-6, 2-6
2021-08-29vs SGV Dare Doubles -Flores - WNSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAmberlee Baugus / Christie Boniface vs Jina Lee / Ellie Wei6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesVeronica Saucedo / Miki Makiko Shimizu vs Maria Ramirez / Sandra Zane3-6, 5-7
W#1 DoublesChristie Boniface / Karla Garcia vs Theona Zhordania / Julia Campbell7-5, 7-5
L#3 DoublesVeronica Saucedo / Miki Makiko Shimizu vs Gloria Cardoza / Janine Baker6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#1 DoublesNicole Reyes / Christie Boniface vs Rosie Bonilla / Aydee Martinez6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesVeronica Saucedo / Miki Makiko Shimizu vs Kam Jara / Victoria Gifford6-0, 6-1
W#1 DoublesNicole Reyes / Christie Boniface vs Lauren Nicole Finke / Beverly Martin6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMiki Makiko Shimizu / Veronica Saucedo vs Maribeth F Rodriguez / Debbie Carmody6-4, 7-5
2021-07-31vs SGV Dare Doubles -Flores - WNSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAmberlee Baugus / Christie Boniface vs Ellie Wei / Ying Li6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesVeronica Saucedo / Leisha Hendrix vs Rachel Brereton / Barbara Minor2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#1 DoublesChristie Boniface / Karla Garcia vs Trish Newlin / Rosie Bonilla6-4, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SGV - Women 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.68 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.14
Amberlee Baugus
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.88
Christie Boniface
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.80
Karla Garcia
published
3.64
Nicole Reyes
published
3.54
Veronica Saucedo
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.10
Miki Makiko Shimizu
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christie Boniface + Amberlee Baugus213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Amberlee Baugus
228W–105L career · 2 lines in 2021
14%85%<1%
4.14
4
Christie Boniface
97W–88L career · 9 lines in 2021
<1%81%19%
3.88
Karla Garcia
2W–18L career · no lines in 2021
94%6%<1%
3.80
Nicole Reyes
99W–45L career · no lines in 2021
<1%14%86%
3.64
4
Veronica Saucedo
145W–113L career · 6 lines in 2021
37%63%<1%
3.54
Miki Makiko Shimizu
20W–32L career · no lines in 2021
23%77%<1%
3.10

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.