Teams

Lakes @ CH/Teague W2.5

2025 DALLAS TENNIS N · A W2.5 WINTER LEAGUE - Friday

11 players · average NTRP 2.50 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-03-07vs Las Colinas/Laurent W2.5Won 10
W#1 DoublesMarisa Lockhart / Tica Taylor vs Kara Tibor / Brenda Lunderby6-1, 6-2
2025-02-14vs DAC/Toups W2.5Won 10
W#2 DoublesJill Schmidt / Elizabeth Asturi vs Amanda Brock / Mary Elizabeth Johnson6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for A W2.5 WINTER LEAGUE - Friday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.51 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.82
Mai Schaefer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.71
Jillian Teague
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.52
Ashley Downing
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 2.5
2.41
Gina Emadi-Karp
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.33
Tica Taylor
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.28
Marisa Lockhart
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Anju Mathew
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Elizabeth Asturi
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Jill Schmidt
published
Lacey Wostal
published
Lindsey Pierce
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mai Schaefer + Jillian Teague3259% gamesnot enough data
Lacey Wostal + Jillian Teague213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mai Schaefer
19W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
2.82
Jillian Teague
12W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
2.71
2.5
Ashley Downing
11W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%45%55%
2.52
Gina Emadi-Karp
3W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
75%25%<1%
2.41
Tica Taylor
5W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
89%11%<1%
2.33
Marisa Lockhart
4W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
94%6%<1%
2.28
2.5
Anju Mathew
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Elizabeth Asturi
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Jill Schmidt
0W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Lacey Wostal
7W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Lindsey Pierce
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.